Bismillahir Rahmaanir Raheem
Truth, wherever you find it, whatever its shape or form, remains truth. You may not want to see it, you may choose not to accept it, you may decide to turn a blind eye to it. None of this changes the fact that TRUTH is TRUTH. Truth doesn't depend on wether you think it's old fashioned or modern, it doesn't change if you decide to pretend it isn't there. It just IS.
The arabic word for it is Haqq. (TRUTH, in its absolute form). The thing about coming to Islam is you realise that your inner TRUTH is. Most reverts will tell you that there simply came a day when they were muslim. They didn't choose to walk away from what they believed, they simply realised, one day, that what they believed in no longer resonated in them. Why? Because the TRUTH will set you free. (As Jesus -Essa as- said).
So why is it that people will choose to believe in ANYTHING as bizarre as it may seem, rather than the truth? For example, why would someone believe in poltergeists but not in Jinnati? Why would they believe angels fall yet say they are created without choice?
The answer, for me, is this: Truth is INALIENABLE, and it demands action. Truth cuts between the very marrow of life and whatever existed before the light of truth has shone, simply is no more. No pretence can cover up the void of what no longer exists. As the saying goes, you can fool some of the people all of the time, you can fool all of the people some of the time, but you will NEVER fool all of the people all of the time. Why? Because YOU will know you're pretending, and that means there's ONE person you can't fool.
The TRUTH therefore, is that one thing that cuts to the quick of whatever you may have believed before. When Jesus (Essa, as) said that "I AM THE TRUTH, THE WAY, and THE LIFE" he is saying three things -
a) THE TRUTH - in other words, not PAUL, not PETER, JESUS (Essa, as). What did he do?
1) he rose early to pray, left people at lunchtime to pray, would "retreat" to pray throughout the day.
2) he prostrated to pray
b) THE WAY -
3) he said, when asked how to pray "OUR FATHER (creator in Hebrew, don't go literal crazy - READ what it said!!)in other words, he said ASK HIM, the ONE
4) he said that real followers of his would be seen by their works, that they would DO WHAT HE DID. (review points 1 through to 3)
c) THE LIFE -
5) One should lead the life he led. (for a third time, he re-itterates DO WHAT HE DID - see 1 - 3.
6) he said that until he returns, not a single dot from an i or a till from a T would be removed from the "word of God". Yet the bible has over 28000 versions, so what did he mean? He meant that the WORD - the TRUTH - is not dependent on man changing the books, it will survive, it will always be THE TRUTH. It was not just a statement but a warning that EVERYTHING that had been prescribed, remained.
7) He said he didn't come to abolish the law, but to fufil it. How much clearer could he have been, our beloved Jesus (Essa, as)
So I ask you - what would he have to say for you to believe he was NOT the son of God? Let's look at SOME of what JESUS said..
1) That he ISN'T God? He said that! He said, when Pilates told him the people accuse him of saying he is the son of God - he said "IT IS YOU THAT SAYS THAT!"
2) He said GO TO THE FATHER. (Creator, in Hebrew, not literally "father")
3) He said pray TO the FATHER (Creator, in Hebrew, not literally father - are you getting this?)
4) He said NOTHING would be removed from the law until he returned. Has he returned? (If you believe he died and then was raised, you need to ask yourself if GOD can DIE.. you then need to go read the bible where he said he WILL RETURN... so, why are you eating pork, for example?)
5)He said "My God, my GOD, why have YOU abandoned ME?" - in other words, here we see TWO people; GOD, and ME. If you say he was separated from God by sin, then you cannot say God died for your sins, because he was separated, right?
6) He was the friend of beggars, prostitutes, and spent his life telling people about GOD - not about HIMSELF.. what do christians do?
If Jesus said ALL the above, and he is your TRUTH, your WAY and your LIFE - how are you living? What truth are you believing? Who are YOU praying to? If you're confused, you need to hear not from Paul, or Peter, or any man - you need to read the words of God himself - did you know the Quran is written in the first person, by a man who never learnt to read, a book that has never been changed or adulterated since the day it was made, who will tell you about our beloved JESUS and about his return, as he promised.
Maybe, just maybe, you need an inspiration to TRUTH. Not because I said it, but because HE did.
So many people wear the bracelets, and so many people wear the necklaces, the bookcases, etc.. these ALL say the same thing, as though Jesus (Essa as) is somehow whispering from back in the day "WHAT WOULD JESUS DO????"
Would he follow Paul? Would he follow Peter? Would he follow HIMSELF? Or would he turn you to face the CREATOR because of HIS LOVE for HIM.. We muslims believe in the INJEEL - the living word that Jesus (Essa as) was.. the book that was within him, through his actions. Even the bible says "In the beginning there was the word, and the word became man." - JESUS (Essa as) is the WORD - are you listening to him, or to PAUL, PETER, or the NICENE council?
Food for thought, isn't it?
Showing posts with label bible. Show all posts
Showing posts with label bible. Show all posts
Monday, February 25, 2013
Tuesday, January 29, 2013
The thirteen tribes of Isreal - Atila the Hun??
Bismillahir Rahmaanir Raheem
It is well recorded that there were in fact 12 tribes of Isreal. However, is the Isreal of today, the one that claims heritage over SO much of Palestine (given by the UN and the balance taken by force) actually Isreal? You be the judge.. Perhaps, just perhaps, you may see Palestine in a different light!
***free gift at the end of this post
Please note:: lest you think this is islamic propaganda, please note that the writing below was written by christians -
Allow me to introduce you to the THIRTEEN tribes of Isreal.. where Rome is alive and well ..
THE THIRTEENTH TRIBE
So, I'm just saying - when the truth is out there.. WHO is actually the "bad guy" in Palestine?... Make duah today.. that Allah may reveal what is already out there, and that hearts may listen, insh'Allah!
********************************
So where is the free gift? Well, the gift is a link to the entire book! - free!
http://www.fantompowa.info/13th%20Tribe.pdf
It is well recorded that there were in fact 12 tribes of Isreal. However, is the Isreal of today, the one that claims heritage over SO much of Palestine (given by the UN and the balance taken by force) actually Isreal? You be the judge.. Perhaps, just perhaps, you may see Palestine in a different light!
***free gift at the end of this post
Please note:: lest you think this is islamic propaganda, please note that the writing below was written by christians -
Allow me to introduce you to the THIRTEEN tribes of Isreal.. where Rome is alive and well ..
The Thirteenth Tribe
by Arthur Koestler
THE KHAZAR EMPIRE AND ITS HERITAGE
This book traces the history of the ancient Khazar Empire, a major but almost forgotten power in Eastern Europe, which in the Dark Ages became converted to Judaism. Khazaria was finally wiped out by the forces of Genghis Khan, but evidence indicates that the Khazars themselves migrated to Poland and formed the cradle of Western Jewry. . .
The Khazars' sway extended from the Black Sea to the Caspian, from the Caucasus to the Volga, and they were instrumental in stopping the Muslim onslaught against Byzantium, the eastern jaw of the gigantic pincer movement that in the West swept across northern Africa and into Spain.
In the second part of this book, "The Heritage," Mr. Koestler speculates about the ultimate faith of the Khazars and their impact on the racial composition and social heritage of modern Jewry. He produces a large body of meticulously detailed research in support of a theory that sounds all the more convincing for the restraint with which it is advanced. Yet should this theory be confirmed, the term "anti-Semitism" would become void of meaning, since, as Mr. Koestler writes, it is based "on a misapprehension shared by both the killers and their victims. The story of the Khazar Empire, as it slowly emerges from the past, begins to look like the most cruel hoax which history has ever perpetrated."
ISBN 0-394-40284-7
THE KHAZAR EMPIRE AND ITS HERITAGE
Rise and Fall of the Khazars
I RISE
II CONVERSION
III DECLINE
EARLY RUSSIAN CULTURE BELITTLED
SOVIET HISTORIAN REBUKED
IV FALL
V EXODUS
VI WHERE FROM?
VII CROSS-CURRENTS
VIII RACE AND MYTH
SUMMARY
A NOTE ON SPELLING
A NOTE ON SOURCES
(A) ANCIENT SOURCES
(B) MODERN LITERATURE
THE "KHAZAR CORRESPONDENCE"
SOME IMPLICATIONS - ISRAEL AND THE DIASPORA
SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY-oOo-What the Critics have to say!Finally Available To ALL - Absolute Historical Proof : Jews are not Israelites!
Research Proves "Jews" are non-Israelite Asiatics!
DATELINE U.S.A. (1977) -- In 1976 Random House published a book that should have hit the Christian Churches like a blockbuster, but instead they chose totally to ignore it. It dealt with the racial origin of the people in Communist and Christian countries who call themselves "Jews," and whom the Churches (and the Jews themselves) generally insist are "God's Chosen People," the Israelite descendants of Abraham. Since the late 1800's a small number of Bible Scholars, who were also students of History and Racial origins, have insisted the Church denominations were wrong; that instead of being Israelites, these Jews from Eastern Europe and Western Asia were descended from Mongolians and other Asiatic peoples who had adopted Judaism as their "religion" over 1,000 years ago and had become know as "Jews." These Bible scholars were ignored or condemned, and often called "cultists" or "anti-Semites."
Now, after many years of research, a well-known Jewish author, Arthur Koestler has published a 255 page book titled THE THIRTEENTH TRIBE in which he proves the same point; i.e. that these Eastern European "Jews" are neither Israelites nor "Semites," but are instead Khazars, Mongols, and Huns! Most major newspapers and magazines reviewed the book during 1976. Also, Random House, the publisher, advertised it extensively and began some of their ads with the following headline: WHAT IF MOST JEWS AREN'T REALLY SEMITES AT ALL? In addition, Random House quoted the following reviews:
"Mr. Koestler's excellent book...Is as readable as it is thought-provoking. Nothing could be more stimulating than the skill, elegance and erudition with which he marshals his facts and develops his theories..." Fitzroy Maclean, New York Times Book Review.
"You do not have to be Jewish to be interested... Are today's Western Jews really ethnic, Semitic, Biblical Jews, or are most of them descendants of converted Khazars?...This compact, interesting book...examines tragic-ironic implications in [this question] for modern history...It should fascinate." --Edmund Fuller, Wall Street Journal
"Koestler marshals the evidence in a clear and convincing way. He tells a good story, pulling together materials from medieval Muslims and Jewish travelers, scholarly controversy and the mysterious lore of the Khazars." --Raymond Sokolov, Newsweek
Robert Kirsch of the Los Angeles Times stated in his lengthy review that 'Arthur Koestler publicizes with his customary skills a daring hypothesis: that THE KHAZAR JEWS MIGRATED TO POLAND AND BECAME THE FOREBEARS OF EASTERN EUROPEAN JEWRY...' Then Kirsch quoted Prof. A. N. Poliak of Tel Aviv University, who stated that "The large majority of world Jewry is descended from the Jews of Khazaria." Then he again quoted Koestler in THE THIRTEENTH TRIBE, "If so, this would mean that their ancestors came not from the Jordan but from the Volga; not from Canaan but from the Caucasus, once believed to be the cradle of the Aryan race; and that GENETICALLY THEY ARE MORE RELATED TO THE HUN, UIGUR, AND MAGYAR TRIBES THAN TO THE SEED OF ABRAHAM, ISAAC, AND JACOB..." (emphasis added) We cannot stress enough how absolutely imperative it is for all Christian Americans to consider the startling proof in Arthur Koestler's book that today's Jews are not Israelites. The Jewish influence on American life has reached such a stage that no student of contemporary history can ignore it. Not only the news media are Jewish monopolies, but top positions in the U.S. government are largely filled by Eastern European Jews. The magazine and book publishing houses are in Jewish hands; and movies, television, and the other entertainment industries are dominated by Jews in all phases. America's government and most of her people's sources of information are controlled and directed by Jews. If these people were really "God's Chosen People," perhaps Americans would have little cause for concern -- BUT WHAT IF THEY ARE REALLY THE "HUNS" AND THEREFORE THE ANCIENT ENEMIES OF CHRISTENDOM? Since many Americans may not have an opportunity to read Koestler's book, we shall herewith submit our own index-style review.
THE THIRTEENTH TRIBE
(by Arthur Koestler, Random House)
Reviewed by Pastor Sheldon Emry
Page |
Information |
| 15 | Khazars adopt Judaism as their religion in A.D. 740. |
| 16 | Majority of Eastern European Jews are Khazar and Japhetic in origin, not Semitic. Refers to 1973 Jewish Encyclopedia and A. N. Poliak, Professor, Medieval Jewish History, Tel Aviv University. |
| 17 | Jews more closely related to Hun, Uigur, and Magyrs than to the seed of Abraham Isaac and Jacob. |
| 18 | Khazars exacted tribute from subject peoples. |
| 20 | Identified them with the hosts of Gog and Magog. |
| 22 | German word Ketzer is our word for Khazar and means heretic or Jew. |
| 23 | Khazars were with Attila the Hun in 4th century. |
| 37-39 | Some were phallic worshipers, killed anyone thought to be extra intelligent and called it an offering to god. |
| 46 | Quotes 1,000-year-old Arab historian, "The Khazars and their King are all Jews...some are of the opinion that Gog and Magog are the Khazars." |
| 47-50 | Khazars were re-exporters of foreign goods, middlemen, inspectors of trade, goldsmiths, and silversmiths; and they exacted 10% tax on all trade. |
| 59-63 | Jews fled Rome and Greece to Khazaria to avoid forced conversion to Christianity. They adopted Islam when forced, repudiating it when safe. |
| 72 | Khazar King, in a letter, traced his people in Togarma and Japheth, the ancestors of all the Turkish tribes. |
| 81 | In A.D. 864 a monk wrote "there exists a people under the sky in regions where no Christians can be found, whose name is Gog and Magog, and who are Huns; among them is one called Gazari [Khazari?], who are circumcised and observe Judaism in its entirety." |
| 93 | Russian communists tried to hide Khazar-Jewish connection! |
| 95-132 | History of breaking up of Khazar Empire and integration of these Jews into Russia, Poland, etc. |
| 135 | Khazar kingdom known as a kingdom of "Red" Jews. |
| 141 | Khazars joined Ghengis Khan and retained their Judaism. |
| 145 | Interchangeable names --Khazar, Zhid (or Yid), and Jew |
| 151 | Majority of Jews in Middle Ages were Khazars. |
| 152-154 | Jews were mintmasters, royal treasurers, tax collectors, and money lenders. Principal source of income was foreign trade and the levying of customs dues and they practiced communal life. |
| 159-161 | They lost the name of Khazars and became known as Jews. During Dark Ages commerce largely in Jewish hands, including slave trade. |
| 163-167 | During Crusades whole families and towns of Jews committed suicide rather than accept Christianity. |
| 167-171 | Proves only a handful of Sephardim Jews were in Europe so the vast majority of Jews today are Khazar in origin. |
| 172-174 | Gives origin of Yiddish language. It is NOT Hebrew! |
| 178 | "The Jewish dark ages may be said to begin with the Renaissance." (Reviews comment: This remark by the Jew Cecil Roth, coupled with other information, is a sorrowful admission that the Jews were supreme in the Dark Ages but lost their dominion over Europe when the Light of God's Word brought about the Renaissance!) |
| 180-199 | Quotes from many sources to prove Jews NOT descended from Biblical Israelites, ending with this, ...evidence from anthropology concurs with history in refuting the popular belief in a Jewish race descended from the biblical tribe. |
| 200-222 | Refers to others who have written on the same subject. |
| 223 | Israeli's right to exist...not based on...the mythological covenant of Abraham with God; it is based on international law -- i.e., on the United Nations' decision of 1947. . . |
| 224-226 | Koestler ends his book by saying he believes many Jews have learned of their Khazar ancestry and now reject the Chosen-Race doctrine. |
THE THIRTEENTH TRIBE proves beyond doubt that modern Jews are not Biblical Israelites. Every church member in America should insist that his Pastor investigate these claims. Are our Jewish politicians, publishers, movie makers, and opinion molders God's "Chosen People"? Or are they Mongol and Hun infiltrators of Christendom?*****************************
Is The Jews' "Chosen People" Masquerade Finally Over?
Shortly after World War I, Henry Ford, founder of the Ford Motor Company, assembled a staff of experts in Detroit to conduct research on the European Jews who had been entering America in large numbers since the 1880's. Ford provided the staff with several million dollars for this research, and in 1923 he published the results in a four-volume work titled "THE INTERNATIONAL JEW." It was Henry Ford's conclusion that very few of these people who called themselves "Jews" were descendants of the Bible Israelites. Ford further proved that these Jews, using all sorts of crimes while under the cloak of being the Chosen People of the Bible, were rapidly taking economic and political control of America. In the religious field, Ford claimed THE JEWS HAD SECRETLY GAINED CONTROL OF MOST PROTESTANT SEMINARIES AND CHRISTIAN BOOK- PUBLISHING HOUSES and had been able to remove almost all criticism of Jews from Christian literature. In summing up his findings, Henry Ford stated, "The Jews are not the Chosen People, though practically the entire Church has succumbed to the propaganda which declares them to be so." Ford's book caused a furor for a few years but soon disappeared from colleges, universities, and public libraries and became unobtainable at any price. The Churches continued to teach "The Jews are God's Chosen People, Israel," and the (by then) Jewish-dominated news media began to refer to Jews always as Israelites. Anyone opposing the increasing Jewish control of the nations was immediately branded "anti-Semitic;" and Jewish dominated Seminaries taught new ministers to quote Genesis 12:1-3 and sternly warn their flocks that anyone speaking unfavorably of the Jews would be "cursed by God." Jewish control of American society, politics, and religions continued to increase.
In 1951 retired U.S. Military Intelligence Officer, Col. John Beaty, published a scholarly 265-page book IRON CURTAIN OVER AMERICA. In it Col. Beaty gave overwhelming evidence this strange Race of Eastern European "Jews" were actually Khazar and Mongol Asiatics and had no racial ancestory in Israel at all.
He then proved that by 1951 these "Jews" had a stranglehold on American politics, on Banking and Credit, on all sources of news, on the entertainment industry, on America's education system, and that they were the predominant race as judges, lawyers, doctors, and in organized crime. The Jewish news media refused to review the book, Jewish book dealers refused to handle it, Christian book stores ignored it, and only a few thousand copies were distributed. Most Americans never heard of IRON CURTAIN OVER AMERICA. Now, because of renewed interest, both THE INTERNATIONAL JEW (in an abridged edition) and IRON CURTAIN OVER AMERICA have been reprinted and are available. (See ordering information below). The latest, and perhaps the most succinct book on this subject, is ISRAEL'S 5 TRILLION DOLLAR SECRET by Col. Curtis B. Dall, former son-in-law of Franklin Delano Roosevelt, and a personal acquaintance of many high officials in the U.S. Govern ment since the 1930's. Col. Dall lives and works in the Washington, D. C. area, and his book, published in 1977. Col. Dall proves again, from reliable sources, that the Jews are NOT Israelites. In fact, Col. Dall calls their masquerade as "Israel" the greatest "hoax" of the last centuries! It should be read by every non-Jew.
You now know their false identity as "Israel" protects these "Jews" from being exposed as aliens and as anti-Americans. Read the books below. Give this sheet to your Minister. Tell him to preach the truth - or resign! Most preaching today is based on the "Jew-Israel" myth, and it is false.
"Fear them not therefore; for there is nothing covered that shall not be revealed: and hid, that shall not be known. What I tell you in darkness, that speak ye in light: and what ye hear in the ear, that preach ye on the housetops" (Jesus, in Matthew 10:26,27).
So, I'm just saying - when the truth is out there.. WHO is actually the "bad guy" in Palestine?... Make duah today.. that Allah may reveal what is already out there, and that hearts may listen, insh'Allah!
********************************
So where is the free gift? Well, the gift is a link to the entire book! - free!
http://www.fantompowa.info/13th%20Tribe.pdf
Wednesday, December 12, 2012
Why say NO to Christmas?
Bismillahir Rahmaanir Raheem
It is the "Silly Season" and let's face it, it's no secret that christians are so divided among themselves that they cannot agree on even the most basic of principles from wether or not a woman can preach to wether a christmas tree is "scriptural". There's no need to re-invent the wheel and try to find the answers to various christmas related questions. So here's an article written by a christian to christians, regarding christmas. Erm... need I say more?

PLEASE NOTE: I do not advocate the beliefs the writer advocates, I include extracts of his article here, simply because it is well researched and basically shows how the bible itself speaks against "christmas"..
All rights of the extracts of this article to its author David C Pack .
"Catholic Encyclopedia, 1911 edition, under “Christmas”: “Christmas was not among the earliest festivals of the Church…the first evidence of the feast is from Egypt.” Further, “Pagan customs centering around the January calends gravitated to Christmas.” Under “Natal Day,” Origen, an early Catholic writer, admitted, “…In the Scriptures, no one is recorded to have kept a feast or held a great banquet on his birthday. It is only sinners (like Pharaoh and Herod) who make great rejoicings over the day in which they were born into this world” (emphasis mine).
The Encyclopedia Americana, 1956 edition, adds, “Christmas…was not observed in the first centuries of the Christian church, since the Christian usage in general was to celebrate the death of remarkable persons rather than their birth…a feast was established in memory of this event [ Jesus's birth] in the fourth century. In the fifth century the Western Church ordered the feast to be celebrated forever on the day of the Mithraic rites of the birth of the sun and at the close of the Saturnalia, as no certain knowledge of the day of Christ's birth existed.”
It was 300 years after Christ before the Roman church kept Christmas, and not until the fifth century that it was mandated to be kept throughout the empire as an official festival honoring “Christ.”
"Christ" said, “But in vain they do worship Me, teaching for doctrines the commandments of men” (Matt. 15:9). Christmas is not a command of God—it is a tradition of men. "Christ" continued, “Full well you reject the commandment of God, that you may keep your own tradition” (Mark 7:9). Every year, throughout the world, on December 25th, hundreds of millions do just that!
We will see that God plainly commands, “Follow not the way of the heathen.” But most people do not fear God, and He allows them to make their own decisions. Human beings are free moral agents—free to obey or disobey God! (...)
Luke 2:8 explains that when "Christ" was born, “there were in the same country shepherds abiding in the field, keeping watch over their flock by night.” Note that they were “abiding” in the field. This never happened in December. Both Ezra 10:9-13 and the Song of Solomon 2:11 show that winter was the rainy season and shepherds could not stay on cold, open fields at night.
Numerous encyclopedias plainly state that "Christ" was not born on December 25th! The Catholic Encyclopedia directly confirms this. In all likelihood, "Christ" was born in the fall! A lengthy technical explanation would prove this point.
Since we now know that December 25th was nowhere near "Christ's" actual birthdate, where did the festival associated with this date come from?
Now read this quote under “Christmas”: “In the Roman world, the Saturnalia (December 17) was a time of merrymaking and exchanging of gifts. December 25 was also regarded as the birthdate of the Iranian mystery god Mithra, the Sun of Righteousness. On the Roman New Year (January 1), houses were decorated with greenery and lights, and gifts were given to children and the poor. To these observances were added the German and Celtic Yule rites when the Teutonic tribes penetrated into Gaul, Britain and central Europe. Food and good fellowship, the Yule log and Yule cakes, greenery and fir trees, gifts and greetings all commemorated different aspects of this festive season. (..)” (Encyclopedia Britannica, 15th ed., vol. II, p. 903).
A final quote about the selection of December 25th as the birthdate of "Christ" is necessary. Note an article in The Toronto Star, December 1984, by Alan Edmonds, entitled, “We owe a lot to Druids, Dutch”: “The Reformation cast a blight on Christmas. By then, of course, clever ecclesiastical politicians had adopted the Pagan mid-winter festival as the alleged birthdate of Jesus, of Nazareth, and thrown in a few other Pagan goodies to make their takeover more palatable.”
December 25th was not selected because it was the birth of "Christ" or because it was even near it. It was selected because it coincided with the idolatrous pagan festival Saturnalia—and this celebration must be carefully examined. In any event, we do not know the exact date of "Christ's" birth. (...)
Some years ago, a priest in New Jersey told his Sunday school class that Santa was a myth. The outrage from parents and his supervisors was swift. He had “killed Santa!” He had “destroyed family tradition!” He had “usurped family authority,” the article continued. He was officially censored by his superiors for being “overzealous and insensitive.”
His crime? He told the truth!
According to Langer's Encyclo-pedia of World History, (article “Santa”), “Santa” was a common name for Nimrod throughout Asia Minor. This was also the same fire god who came down the chimneys of the ancient pagans and the same fire god to whom infants were burned and eaten in human sacrifice among those who were once God's people.
Today Santa Claus comes from “Saint Nicholas.” Washington Irving, in 1809, is responsible for remaking the original old, stern bishop of this same name into the new “jolly St. Nick” in his Knickerbocker History of New York. (Most of the rest of America's Christmas traditions are even more recent than this.) “Old Nick” has long been recognized as a term for the devil.
In Revelation 2:6 and 15, we read about a “doctrine of the Nicolaitanes,” which Christ twice tells His Church “[He] hates.” Let's analyze the word Nicolaitane. It means “follower of Nicholas.” Nikos means “conqueror, destroyer.” Laos means “people.” Nicolaitanes, then, are people who follow the conqueror or destroyer—Nimrod. If you have believed that following Christmas is an innocent Christian custom, let this truth sink in!
The Bibliotheca Sacra states, “The interchange of presents between friends is a like characteristic of Christmas and the Saturnalia, and must have been adopted by Christians from the pagans, as the admonition of Tertullian plainly shows” (Vol. 12, pp. 153-155).
Like every other aspect of Christmas, the shocking truth is that even this supposed Christian custom does not come from the Bible. It is an irony that people love to believe they are following the custom of the wise men giving to Christ, when actually they are giving almost exclusively to each other! What hypocrisy! Christ is completely forgotten.
The Bible actually teaches that Christians should not keep birthdays. Numerous scriptures make this principle clear. (...) However, what if you went to a birthday party that had been prepared for you and everybody gave gifts to each other and you were left out? The idea is ridiculous! If this happened, you would say that people were being selfish and forgetting you. In fact, most people give to others on Christmas merely because they expect to receive gifts themselves!
Let's briefly return to the “wise men” who gave gifts to Christ. The scripture describing this is Matthew 2:1-11: “Now when Jesus was born in Bethlehem of Judaea in the days of Herod the king, behold, there came wise men from the east to Jerusalem, saying, Where is He that is born King of the Jews?…And when they were come into the house, they saw the young Child with Mary His mother, and fell down, and worshipped him: and when they had opened their treasures, they presented unto Him gifts; gold, and frankincense, and myrrh.”
It is commonly supposed that these were birthday presents for “baby Jesus.” But is this what the Bible actually says? Absolutely not! First, it is important to note that they did give the gifts to Jesus. They did not stand in his presence and exchange gifts among themselves or give them to others. The gifts were “presented unto Him.” Also, they arrived well after his “birthday.” This is another reason these could not have been “birthday presents.” (...)
The following demonstrates what the Babylonians believe about the origin of the Christmas tree: “An old Babylonish fable told of an evergreen tree which sprang out of a dead tree stump. The old stump symbolized the dead Nimrod, the new evergreen tree symbolized that Nimrod had come to life again in Tammuz! Among the Druids the oak was sacred, among the Egyptians it was the palm, and in Rome it was the fir, which was decorated with red berries during the Saturnalia!” (Walsh, Curiosities of Popular Customs, p. 242).
Frederick J. Haskin's Answers to Questions states, “The Christmas tree is from Egypt, and its origin dates from a period long anterior to the Christmas Era.” Did you know this—that the Christmas tree long preceded Christianity?
Most aspects of Christmas are not referred to in the Bible. Of course, the reason is that they are not from God (The reader should remember this article was written by a christian writer, not by the blogger yesimmuslimdealwithit) (...) The Christmas tree, however, is directly mentioned in the Bible! Turn to Jeremiah 10:2-5, “Thus says the Lord, Learn not the way of the heathen…For the customs of the people are vain: for one cuts a tree out of the forest, the work of the hands of the workman, with the axe. They deck it with silver and with gold; they fasten it with nails and with hammers, that it move not. They are upright as the palm tree, but speak not: they must needs be borne, because they cannot go. Be not afraid of them; for they cannot do evil, neither also is it in them to do good.”
This plain description of the modern Christmas tree is clear. (The bible )directly refers to it as “the way of the heathen.” Just as directly, He commands His people to “learn not the way of the heathen,” calling these customs “vain.” Verse 23 adds a remarkable and powerful statement: “O Lord, I know that the way of man is not in himself: it is not in man that walks to direct his [own] steps.” God must teach people how to live. Man simply cannot figure out God's ways for himself. (Note from yesImMuslimDealwithit - please read this again - Christians will tell muslims that they do not need laws because they are set free.. so no, I'm not agreeing with the writer in all he says, but I want readers to note what christians themselves say about christmas - their OWN bible denounces it.)
There is no room in Jeremiah 10 to believe, as some have tried to suggest, that because these trees are powerless of themselves, it is not really forbidden to have a Christmas tree. God condemns the putting up of pagan (Christmas) trees with this plain Bible command!
The Encyclopedia Americana states, “The holly, the mistletoe, the Yule log…are relics of pre-Christian time.” In other words, paganism! The Yule log was commonly used in a rite of Teutonic nature worship.
Frederick Haskin further states, “The use of Christmas wreaths is believed by authorities to be traceable to the pagan customs of decorating buildings and places of worship at the feast which took place at the same time as Christmas.”
The Encyclopedia Britannica, under “Celastrales,” exposes the origin of the holly wreath: “European pagans brought holly sprays into their homes, offering them to the fairy people of the forests as refuge from the harsh winter weather. During the Saturnalia, the Roman winter festival, branches of holly were exchanged as tokens of friendship. The earliest Roman Christians apparently used holly as a decoration at the Christmas season.”
There are dozens of different types of holly. Virtually all of them come in male and female varieties—such as “Blue Prince and Blue Princess” or “Blue Boy and Blue Girl” or “China Boy and China Girl.” Female holly plants cannot have berries unless a nearby male plant pollinates them. It is easy to see why the holly wreath found its way into pagan rituals as a token of friendship and fertility!
Christmas is incomplete to many unless it involves “kissing under the mistletoe.” This pagan custom was natural on a night that involved much revelry done in the spirit of drunken orgies. Just like today, this “kissing” usually occurred at the beginning of any modern Saturnalia/Christmas celebration. I will never forget having to always kiss my friends' mothers upon entering each of their houses every Christmas. It was the first thing that we did. I hated it—but it was something I “had to do”! Mistletoe was considered to have special powers of healing for those who “reveled” under it.
The Encyclopedia Britannica, under “Santalales,” states, “The European mistletoe is thought to have had special ritual significance in Druidical ceremonies and lives in folklore today, its special status as the Christmas mistletoe having come from Anglo-Saxon times.” Mistletoe is a parasite that lives on oak trees. (Recall that the Druids worshipped in oak tree groves.) The ancient Celtics (associated with the Druids) used to give mistletoe as an herbal remedy to barren animals to make them fertile. It is still referred to as “all healer” in Celtic. (Yesimmuslimdealwithit comment - and yes, it is a medicinal herb, but it should not be used for any spiritual purpose for only ALLAH heals!)
Like mistletoe, holly berries were also thought to be sacred to the sun god. The original “sun log” came to be called the yule log. “Yule” simply means “wheel,” which has long been a pagan representation of the sun. No wonder people today commonly speak of the “sacred yule-tide season.”
Human beings do not want to obey God (Rom. 8:7). They would rather follow their own “imagination.” They do not understand that God wants their lives to go “well.” He wants happiness, joy and blessings to flow into people's lives. All these are the results of obeying Him.
God inspired Moses to warn parents of the grave responsibility that they have in what and how they teach their children. Notice His instruction in Deuteronomy 6:1, 6-7, 20-21, 25: “Now these are the commandments…which the Lord your God commanded to teach you, that you might do them in the land where you go to possess it…And these words, which I command you this day, shall be in your heart: And you shall teach them diligently unto your children, and shall talk of them when you sit in your house, and when you walk by the way, and when you lie down, and when you rise up…And when your son asks you in time to come, saying, What mean the testimonies, and the statutes, and the judgments, which the Lord our God has commanded you? Then you shall say unto your son, We were Pharaoh's bondmen in Egypt; and the Lord brought us out of Egypt with a mighty hand…And it shall be our righteousness, if we observe to do all these commandments before the Lord our God, as He has commanded us.”
God took Israel out of Egypt—out of the customs of the world around them and revealed His Law to them. He does not want His people going back to the traditions, customs and ways from which He has called them. (note by yesimmuslimdealwithit - the writer sounds like a muslim, doesn't he? After all, he's basically saying one should submit to the laws of Allah, as written in the thorah, right? Submission to Allah's will, to the will of God, has a name - its translated in arabic as "ISLAM".)
When all of the interconnected traditions, filled with the symbolism of worshipping an ancient pagan, humanly devised god, are taught, this is not worshipping the true Creator.
The prophet Isaiah was inspired to write, “Cry aloud, spare not, lift up your voice like a trumpet, and show My people their transgression” (58:1). I have done this.
Notes from yesimmuslimdealwithit - why would the writer weep for the transgressions of the christians, aren't christians free from all transgressions because of "the cross" - oh wait - the cross is also a pagan symbol - !!
Wether you are christian or not, christmas is not. Wether you are christian or not, you should not be hanging up christmas trees, exchanging gifts or participating in anything remotely christmassy. May our muslim brothers and sisters who participate "FOR THE FUN OF IT" take heed - Shirk is not a game, and since christmas is actually orignated in PAGAN and IDOLATROUS beliefs, is it not, then, idolatry? May Allah guide us all, and grant us the truth, always, for truly if the christians believed that the truth would set them free, they would seek the truth. CONVENIENCE is not the same as faith.
It is the "Silly Season" and let's face it, it's no secret that christians are so divided among themselves that they cannot agree on even the most basic of principles from wether or not a woman can preach to wether a christmas tree is "scriptural". There's no need to re-invent the wheel and try to find the answers to various christmas related questions. So here's an article written by a christian to christians, regarding christmas. Erm... need I say more?

PLEASE NOTE: I do not advocate the beliefs the writer advocates, I include extracts of his article here, simply because it is well researched and basically shows how the bible itself speaks against "christmas"..
All rights of the extracts of this article to its author David C Pack .
"Catholic Encyclopedia, 1911 edition, under “Christmas”: “Christmas was not among the earliest festivals of the Church…the first evidence of the feast is from Egypt.” Further, “Pagan customs centering around the January calends gravitated to Christmas.” Under “Natal Day,” Origen, an early Catholic writer, admitted, “…In the Scriptures, no one is recorded to have kept a feast or held a great banquet on his birthday. It is only sinners (like Pharaoh and Herod) who make great rejoicings over the day in which they were born into this world” (emphasis mine).
The Encyclopedia Americana, 1956 edition, adds, “Christmas…was not observed in the first centuries of the Christian church, since the Christian usage in general was to celebrate the death of remarkable persons rather than their birth…a feast was established in memory of this event [ Jesus's birth] in the fourth century. In the fifth century the Western Church ordered the feast to be celebrated forever on the day of the Mithraic rites of the birth of the sun and at the close of the Saturnalia, as no certain knowledge of the day of Christ's birth existed.”
It was 300 years after Christ before the Roman church kept Christmas, and not until the fifth century that it was mandated to be kept throughout the empire as an official festival honoring “Christ.”
Can "Christ" Be Honored by Christmas?
The most common justification that one will hear regarding Christmas is that people have replaced old pagan customs and intents by asserting that they are now “focusing on Christ.” I have heard many say that they are “honoring Christ” in their Christmas-keeping. The problem is that God does not say this is acceptable to Him! Actually, He plainly commands against it! Keeping Christmas dishonors Christ! He considers everything about it to be an abomination! We will soon see why."Christ" said, “But in vain they do worship Me, teaching for doctrines the commandments of men” (Matt. 15:9). Christmas is not a command of God—it is a tradition of men. "Christ" continued, “Full well you reject the commandment of God, that you may keep your own tradition” (Mark 7:9). Every year, throughout the world, on December 25th, hundreds of millions do just that!
We will see that God plainly commands, “Follow not the way of the heathen.” But most people do not fear God, and He allows them to make their own decisions. Human beings are free moral agents—free to obey or disobey God! (...)
Was "Christ" Born on December 25th?
"Christ" was born in the fall of the year. Many have mistakenly believed He was born around the beginning of winter—December 25th! They are wrong! Notice the Adam Clarke Commentary, volume 5, page 370, New York edition: “It was custom among Jews to send out their sheep to the deserts about the Passover [early spring], and bring them home at the commencement of the first rain.” The first rains began in early-to-mid fall. Continuing with this same quote: “During the time they were out, the shepherds watched them night and day. As…the first rain began early in the month of March-esvan, which answers to part of our October and November [begins sometime in October], we find that the sheep were kept out in the open country during the whole summer. And as these shepherds had not yet brought home their flocks, it is a presumptive argument that October had not yet commenced, and that, consequently, (Jesus) was not born on the 25th of December, when no flocks were out in the fields; nor could He have been born later than September, as the flocks were still in the fields by night. On this very ground, the nativity in December should be given up. The feeding of the flocks by night in the fields is a chronological fact…See the quotations from the Talmudists in Lightfoot.”Luke 2:8 explains that when "Christ" was born, “there were in the same country shepherds abiding in the field, keeping watch over their flock by night.” Note that they were “abiding” in the field. This never happened in December. Both Ezra 10:9-13 and the Song of Solomon 2:11 show that winter was the rainy season and shepherds could not stay on cold, open fields at night.
Numerous encyclopedias plainly state that "Christ" was not born on December 25th! The Catholic Encyclopedia directly confirms this. In all likelihood, "Christ" was born in the fall! A lengthy technical explanation would prove this point.
Since we now know that December 25th was nowhere near "Christ's" actual birthdate, where did the festival associated with this date come from?
Now read this quote under “Christmas”: “In the Roman world, the Saturnalia (December 17) was a time of merrymaking and exchanging of gifts. December 25 was also regarded as the birthdate of the Iranian mystery god Mithra, the Sun of Righteousness. On the Roman New Year (January 1), houses were decorated with greenery and lights, and gifts were given to children and the poor. To these observances were added the German and Celtic Yule rites when the Teutonic tribes penetrated into Gaul, Britain and central Europe. Food and good fellowship, the Yule log and Yule cakes, greenery and fir trees, gifts and greetings all commemorated different aspects of this festive season. (..)” (Encyclopedia Britannica, 15th ed., vol. II, p. 903).
A final quote about the selection of December 25th as the birthdate of "Christ" is necessary. Note an article in The Toronto Star, December 1984, by Alan Edmonds, entitled, “We owe a lot to Druids, Dutch”: “The Reformation cast a blight on Christmas. By then, of course, clever ecclesiastical politicians had adopted the Pagan mid-winter festival as the alleged birthdate of Jesus, of Nazareth, and thrown in a few other Pagan goodies to make their takeover more palatable.”
December 25th was not selected because it was the birth of "Christ" or because it was even near it. It was selected because it coincided with the idolatrous pagan festival Saturnalia—and this celebration must be carefully examined. In any event, we do not know the exact date of "Christ's" birth. (...)
What About Santa Claus?
Parents reason that they owe the whole Christmas myth to their children! Christmas traditions are focused primarily on kids, and they are certainly the center of most of what happens. I know because I kept seventeen Christmases. My older sister and younger brother and I were the recipients of much and the givers of very little on that day—and it all started with the Santa Claus lie.Some years ago, a priest in New Jersey told his Sunday school class that Santa was a myth. The outrage from parents and his supervisors was swift. He had “killed Santa!” He had “destroyed family tradition!” He had “usurped family authority,” the article continued. He was officially censored by his superiors for being “overzealous and insensitive.”
His crime? He told the truth!
According to Langer's Encyclo-pedia of World History, (article “Santa”), “Santa” was a common name for Nimrod throughout Asia Minor. This was also the same fire god who came down the chimneys of the ancient pagans and the same fire god to whom infants were burned and eaten in human sacrifice among those who were once God's people.
Today Santa Claus comes from “Saint Nicholas.” Washington Irving, in 1809, is responsible for remaking the original old, stern bishop of this same name into the new “jolly St. Nick” in his Knickerbocker History of New York. (Most of the rest of America's Christmas traditions are even more recent than this.) “Old Nick” has long been recognized as a term for the devil.
In Revelation 2:6 and 15, we read about a “doctrine of the Nicolaitanes,” which Christ twice tells His Church “[He] hates.” Let's analyze the word Nicolaitane. It means “follower of Nicholas.” Nikos means “conqueror, destroyer.” Laos means “people.” Nicolaitanes, then, are people who follow the conqueror or destroyer—Nimrod. If you have believed that following Christmas is an innocent Christian custom, let this truth sink in!
Is It "Scriptural" to Exchange Gifts?
Merchants regularly report that over 60% of their annual retail sales occur during the Christmas shopping season. This represents a tremendous amount of gift buying. Most today believe that gift-giving comes from the Bible example of the “three wise men” (the Bible gives no number) presenting gifts to Christ. Is this true? Where did exchanging gifts come from, and what does God's Word say about it?The Bibliotheca Sacra states, “The interchange of presents between friends is a like characteristic of Christmas and the Saturnalia, and must have been adopted by Christians from the pagans, as the admonition of Tertullian plainly shows” (Vol. 12, pp. 153-155).
Like every other aspect of Christmas, the shocking truth is that even this supposed Christian custom does not come from the Bible. It is an irony that people love to believe they are following the custom of the wise men giving to Christ, when actually they are giving almost exclusively to each other! What hypocrisy! Christ is completely forgotten.
The Bible actually teaches that Christians should not keep birthdays. Numerous scriptures make this principle clear. (...) However, what if you went to a birthday party that had been prepared for you and everybody gave gifts to each other and you were left out? The idea is ridiculous! If this happened, you would say that people were being selfish and forgetting you. In fact, most people give to others on Christmas merely because they expect to receive gifts themselves!
Let's briefly return to the “wise men” who gave gifts to Christ. The scripture describing this is Matthew 2:1-11: “Now when Jesus was born in Bethlehem of Judaea in the days of Herod the king, behold, there came wise men from the east to Jerusalem, saying, Where is He that is born King of the Jews?…And when they were come into the house, they saw the young Child with Mary His mother, and fell down, and worshipped him: and when they had opened their treasures, they presented unto Him gifts; gold, and frankincense, and myrrh.”
It is commonly supposed that these were birthday presents for “baby Jesus.” But is this what the Bible actually says? Absolutely not! First, it is important to note that they did give the gifts to Jesus. They did not stand in his presence and exchange gifts among themselves or give them to others. The gifts were “presented unto Him.” Also, they arrived well after his “birthday.” This is another reason these could not have been “birthday presents.” (...)
Origin of the Christmas Tree
No article about Christmas is complete without some explanation of the “Christmas tree.” We have touched on it without directly focusing on it. The modern Christmas tree originated in Germany. But the Germans got it from the Romans, who got it from the Babylonians and the Egyptians.The following demonstrates what the Babylonians believe about the origin of the Christmas tree: “An old Babylonish fable told of an evergreen tree which sprang out of a dead tree stump. The old stump symbolized the dead Nimrod, the new evergreen tree symbolized that Nimrod had come to life again in Tammuz! Among the Druids the oak was sacred, among the Egyptians it was the palm, and in Rome it was the fir, which was decorated with red berries during the Saturnalia!” (Walsh, Curiosities of Popular Customs, p. 242).
Frederick J. Haskin's Answers to Questions states, “The Christmas tree is from Egypt, and its origin dates from a period long anterior to the Christmas Era.” Did you know this—that the Christmas tree long preceded Christianity?
Most aspects of Christmas are not referred to in the Bible. Of course, the reason is that they are not from God (The reader should remember this article was written by a christian writer, not by the blogger yesimmuslimdealwithit) (...) The Christmas tree, however, is directly mentioned in the Bible! Turn to Jeremiah 10:2-5, “Thus says the Lord, Learn not the way of the heathen…For the customs of the people are vain: for one cuts a tree out of the forest, the work of the hands of the workman, with the axe. They deck it with silver and with gold; they fasten it with nails and with hammers, that it move not. They are upright as the palm tree, but speak not: they must needs be borne, because they cannot go. Be not afraid of them; for they cannot do evil, neither also is it in them to do good.”
This plain description of the modern Christmas tree is clear. (The bible )directly refers to it as “the way of the heathen.” Just as directly, He commands His people to “learn not the way of the heathen,” calling these customs “vain.” Verse 23 adds a remarkable and powerful statement: “O Lord, I know that the way of man is not in himself: it is not in man that walks to direct his [own] steps.” God must teach people how to live. Man simply cannot figure out God's ways for himself. (Note from yesImMuslimDealwithit - please read this again - Christians will tell muslims that they do not need laws because they are set free.. so no, I'm not agreeing with the writer in all he says, but I want readers to note what christians themselves say about christmas - their OWN bible denounces it.)
There is no room in Jeremiah 10 to believe, as some have tried to suggest, that because these trees are powerless of themselves, it is not really forbidden to have a Christmas tree. God condemns the putting up of pagan (Christmas) trees with this plain Bible command!
The Source of Holly Wreaths, Yule Logs and Mistletoe
The Encyclopedia Americana states, “The holly, the mistletoe, the Yule log…are relics of pre-Christian time.” In other words, paganism! The Yule log was commonly used in a rite of Teutonic nature worship.
Frederick Haskin further states, “The use of Christmas wreaths is believed by authorities to be traceable to the pagan customs of decorating buildings and places of worship at the feast which took place at the same time as Christmas.”
The Encyclopedia Britannica, under “Celastrales,” exposes the origin of the holly wreath: “European pagans brought holly sprays into their homes, offering them to the fairy people of the forests as refuge from the harsh winter weather. During the Saturnalia, the Roman winter festival, branches of holly were exchanged as tokens of friendship. The earliest Roman Christians apparently used holly as a decoration at the Christmas season.”
There are dozens of different types of holly. Virtually all of them come in male and female varieties—such as “Blue Prince and Blue Princess” or “Blue Boy and Blue Girl” or “China Boy and China Girl.” Female holly plants cannot have berries unless a nearby male plant pollinates them. It is easy to see why the holly wreath found its way into pagan rituals as a token of friendship and fertility!
Christmas is incomplete to many unless it involves “kissing under the mistletoe.” This pagan custom was natural on a night that involved much revelry done in the spirit of drunken orgies. Just like today, this “kissing” usually occurred at the beginning of any modern Saturnalia/Christmas celebration. I will never forget having to always kiss my friends' mothers upon entering each of their houses every Christmas. It was the first thing that we did. I hated it—but it was something I “had to do”! Mistletoe was considered to have special powers of healing for those who “reveled” under it.
The Encyclopedia Britannica, under “Santalales,” states, “The European mistletoe is thought to have had special ritual significance in Druidical ceremonies and lives in folklore today, its special status as the Christmas mistletoe having come from Anglo-Saxon times.” Mistletoe is a parasite that lives on oak trees. (Recall that the Druids worshipped in oak tree groves.) The ancient Celtics (associated with the Druids) used to give mistletoe as an herbal remedy to barren animals to make them fertile. It is still referred to as “all healer” in Celtic. (Yesimmuslimdealwithit comment - and yes, it is a medicinal herb, but it should not be used for any spiritual purpose for only ALLAH heals!)
Like mistletoe, holly berries were also thought to be sacred to the sun god. The original “sun log” came to be called the yule log. “Yule” simply means “wheel,” which has long been a pagan representation of the sun. No wonder people today commonly speak of the “sacred yule-tide season.”
What Should You Do?
Finally, let's examine what God told His people they should do and the way they ought to teach their children.Human beings do not want to obey God (Rom. 8:7). They would rather follow their own “imagination.” They do not understand that God wants their lives to go “well.” He wants happiness, joy and blessings to flow into people's lives. All these are the results of obeying Him.
God inspired Moses to warn parents of the grave responsibility that they have in what and how they teach their children. Notice His instruction in Deuteronomy 6:1, 6-7, 20-21, 25: “Now these are the commandments…which the Lord your God commanded to teach you, that you might do them in the land where you go to possess it…And these words, which I command you this day, shall be in your heart: And you shall teach them diligently unto your children, and shall talk of them when you sit in your house, and when you walk by the way, and when you lie down, and when you rise up…And when your son asks you in time to come, saying, What mean the testimonies, and the statutes, and the judgments, which the Lord our God has commanded you? Then you shall say unto your son, We were Pharaoh's bondmen in Egypt; and the Lord brought us out of Egypt with a mighty hand…And it shall be our righteousness, if we observe to do all these commandments before the Lord our God, as He has commanded us.”
God took Israel out of Egypt—out of the customs of the world around them and revealed His Law to them. He does not want His people going back to the traditions, customs and ways from which He has called them. (note by yesimmuslimdealwithit - the writer sounds like a muslim, doesn't he? After all, he's basically saying one should submit to the laws of Allah, as written in the thorah, right? Submission to Allah's will, to the will of God, has a name - its translated in arabic as "ISLAM".)
When all of the interconnected traditions, filled with the symbolism of worshipping an ancient pagan, humanly devised god, are taught, this is not worshipping the true Creator.
The prophet Isaiah was inspired to write, “Cry aloud, spare not, lift up your voice like a trumpet, and show My people their transgression” (58:1). I have done this.
Notes from yesimmuslimdealwithit - why would the writer weep for the transgressions of the christians, aren't christians free from all transgressions because of "the cross" - oh wait - the cross is also a pagan symbol - !!
Wether you are christian or not, christmas is not. Wether you are christian or not, you should not be hanging up christmas trees, exchanging gifts or participating in anything remotely christmassy. May our muslim brothers and sisters who participate "FOR THE FUN OF IT" take heed - Shirk is not a game, and since christmas is actually orignated in PAGAN and IDOLATROUS beliefs, is it not, then, idolatry? May Allah guide us all, and grant us the truth, always, for truly if the christians believed that the truth would set them free, they would seek the truth. CONVENIENCE is not the same as faith.
Monday, September 17, 2012
For the love of Jesus (Essa) peace be upon him
Bismillahir Rahmaanir Raheem
For those who may not know, Islam believes in Jesus. (In arabic, his name is Essa, or Isa (peace be upon him) depending on pronounciation). We believe that Isa will return, that we will fight the Dajaal and overcome thereby, and will rule for a predetermined period of time. We believe that he was chosen by Allah (the One living and eternal and self-subsisting God).
In ancient hebrew, the word "father" is similar to the word ALLAH in that it actually means "creator". This is an extremely important fact, a "father" attributes to a creator some sense of "equality" with mankind, and to say furthermore that the Creator has a son, is, linguistically speaking and spiritually, incorrect.
I will not in this post go in to the merits of "was Jesus God" because every muslim reading this knows there is ONLY One God and God can neither be born nor can HE die. Every one who's read the bible (whatever version that may be) will confirm it also says this, since God has NO beginning and NO end. Enough said on that count, we will leave it to another day.
Today I dedicate this post to one of the most inspirational and well loved Prophets; Jesus (Isa, peace be upon him). From the miracle of his conception to the miracles he made which show that he truly was a chosen one; some miracles are in the versioned bibles and some are not. There are a few that christians do not usually know about.
So here is the story of Jesus (Isa as)..
The hebrew people had settled in the blessed land of Palestine. There were 12 tribes of Israel.They held the Torah as Moses (Musa as) had remembered and written it down after breaking the inital plates that Allah had dicated to him. At this point we refer to Allah and the God of the Torah as one and the same. At this stage, they still followed the TORAH as it was originally given. The Prophet David (Dawud as) and his son the Prophet Solomon (Suleiman as) were commended as great kings and commanded great respect.The people led noble lives and where they did not, Suleiman (as) was a most excellent judge.
As time went on, people began to pay less and less attention to the laws of piety and converted to the pagan ways of the Romans who's influence lay everywhere!. The Levites and the Pharasses and Sadjucees, in charge of the holy Torah and the Holy laws, began to notice that and they in turn, also corrupted, hid certain things from the Holy Book and changed others so as to obtain political and spiritual control of a people who had begun to stray.
The people adopted sinful ways and the Pharasees bought and sold salvation and forgiveness just as many years later the Catholics would do.
The Quran repeatedly reminds us that Prophet Adam, the first human being, was born with neither a human mother nor a human father. So the miraculous birth of Jesus (Isa as) affords him no higher standing or presumed partnership with God than Adam. When God ordains a matter, He merely says, "Be" and it is so. "The similitude of Jesus before God is as that of Adam. He created him from dust, then said to him: "Be!" And he was" (3:59).
The angel's visit caused Mary a tremendous amount of anxiety which grew as her baby grew. How could she possibly face giving birth to the child without a husband? She left the temple and went to Nazareth, where she was born and settled in a simple farm house to avoid the public. But still, the anxiety continued. What would people say? Her father was pure man, and her mother, pious, had given birth to her as a gift of Allah! The tongues would surely wag!
Eventually, she decided to leave. She had no idea where she would go but she knew she needed to get away. She sat down in the trunk of a dead palm tree and there she gave birth to a son. She was now even more worried, confused as to what would become of her and how she would care for this baby without food or drink.
A voice nearby said "Grieve not, for your Lord has placed a rivulet below. Shake the truck of this tree and ripe dates will fall. Eat and drink and regain the strength you lost, and be of good cheer, for what you see is by the power of Allah, who made te dry palm tree regain life in order to provide food for you."
Slowly, she regained her strength, comforted by Allah's provision, and in her mind she knew she needed to return to society. The thought of returning was accompanied by the same stress and fears of what people would say. Sensing his mother's worry, the baby began to speak. "If you meet anyone say 'I have vowed to fast for The Beneficent and may not speak to any human today." The miracle of the baby speaking to her gave her courage to do just that. As was to be expected, they chastised her on seeing her, told her she'd committed a terrible sin. She put her finger to her lips and pointed to the child. They asked "how can we speak to a newborn baby?!" But to their total amazement, the child began to speak, clearly, saying "I am Allah's servant. Allah has given me the Book, has made me a prophet, and has blessed me wherever I may be, and has enjoined on me prayers and alms-giving as long as I live. Allah has made me dutiful towards she who has borne me. He has not made me arrogant nor unblessed. Peace unto me the day I was born, the day I die, and the day I shall be raised Alive."
Let's review the happenings thus far as per the Quran itself:
And mention in the Book (the Qur'an, O Muhammad, the story of) Mary, when she withdrew in seclusion from her family to a place facing east. She placed a screen (to screen herself) from them; then We sent to her Our Ruh (angel Gabriel), and he appeared before her in the form of a man in all respects.
Joseph (a carpenter) was very suprised at the story of the birth of Jesus (as) He asked Mary how it could be that a tree could grow without a seed. Mary replied thatit is possible because a the one who created the first tree didn't need a seed, and so too Adam didn't require a seed to be made since Allah does as HE pleases.
The Pharisees and Sadducees felt that this child was dangerous - news of his miraculous birth would no doubt turn people away from obeying their rules and they would loose authority over people who would turn back to God as their only source, thus causing their jewish tenents to crumble. They tried to suppress news of the chil's speech in infancy and accused Mary of a great misdeed. Joseph married Mary, and islam has no problem with Mary having had children afterwards as it does not detract from her saintliness. She was a virgin mother, it doesn't mean to say she died a virgin. After all, she was married and loved her husband Joseph.
By the time Jesus (Essa as) was twelve, he accompanied his mother to Jerusalem. He wanded into the temple and joined a crowd that was listening to the Rabbis. He gave his opinions and taught in the synagogue which disturbed the Rabbis greatly. They were unable to answer the questions he put to them. Try as they might they couldn't silence him. The story of Mary's panic discovering Jesus was missing can also be found in the bible, but the rest of the story is absent, changed just as the then Pharisees and Sadjucees had changed the Torah. Jesus became so engrossed in the discussion that he forgot it was time to head home. In the meantime Mary had left, thinking he might have returned with his relatives or friends. But when she got home and didn't find him there, she panicked - raced back to town, searched high and low for her son. And there was.. sitting in the temple among the learned, debating and conversing with them as though this was the most natural thing. He had forgotten all about the time.
Jesus the boy, becomes a man..
Just as many other aspects of worship had been traded for a life of luxury or labour depending on which side of the breadline one lived, so too the practice of the Sabath had fallen by the way side, as Jesus grew. The old practices of complete rest and worship had simply fallen away or became twisted - suddenly calling a dr for a gravely ill patient was sinful. Life was riddled by hipocrisy, and framed by the outlines of complacency issued by the religious leaders. They were tought that the Sabath was kept in heaven and hence they needed to "observe" the Sabbath . The pharisees took the emphasis off worship and placed it on "doing nothing". You could not travel more than one thousand yards on a Sabbath, etc. 20 000 priests earned their living from the temple, and the rooms f the temple were full. Jesus noticed there were more priests than worshipers, but yet the temples were overflowing with animals being sold for sacrifices for various penances and forgivenesses.
Every step into the temple and within the temple had to be paid for - the catholics years later did no less, didn't they, which provokes the catholic reformation - ? But that's another topic.
There were so many laws, so many sins, and each one had to be paid for with blood of an animal for sacrifice. Every small thing was sinful - even calling that dr for a sick patient. On his way to the temple, Jesus picked two pieces of fruit to feed a hungry child - a violation of the Pharisees! He made a fire for an old women to keep her warm - another violation. He went into the temple and looked around at the 20 000 registered priests.
The Pharisees and Sadducees, who always disagreed about everything, argued continuously, selling off sacrifices whilst arguing. The poor who could not afford the sacrifice offerings for the payment of "sins" and "religious offences" were chased away. The poor queued on the temple stairs, the ill, waiting for a little charity, a little food. But none was given whilst inside the fires roared with the roasting sacrifices. On this same night John (pbuh) and Zakariah (pbuh) were killed by the ruling powers. On the same night, Jesus was told by Allah to call the childred of Israel and turn them BACK to Allah. Jesus spoke out, denounced, and charged that "marketplace" of thieves declaring Allah's word and calling people to a nobler life.
Jesus the Prophet
Throughout his life, Jesus continued to invite people back to the Creator. He performed many miracles, and in Allah's name - (ALLAH working through him), he carved a bird out of clay, and breathed into it so that ALLAH, through him, brought the bird to life. The Romans were not at this stage concerned about Jesus. So long as the Jews were bothered by Jesus they were distracted away from the occupation of Rome.
At one point, they tried to trick Jesus. They brought a woman forward and said "does not the law stipulate the stoning of an adulteress?" Jesus answered "yes" and they argued that if that woman was an adulteress then she should be destroyed, and if he opposed this then he would be destroying his own teaching of a God of forgiveness.
Jesus looked at the Pharisees. He knew they were guilty of FAR more than this woman, so he said "Whoever of YOU is sinless you can stone her!" This did not abolish the law - it pointed out the hypocrisy, it taught about the importance of following a leader that is pious, it spoke to the lies of the pharisees and their "tests", and he attested to the fact that religious leaders are not executioners - ALL IN ONE!
On his way to the temple that moring, Jesus had been followed by a woman who knelt before him and washed his feet with perfume and tears. Jesus asked her to stand an then said "Oh Lord, Forgive her sins."
Jesus taught people to have mercy on one another, to believe in ONE God, the Creator, through him, Allah raised 3 people from the dead. The Jews mocked him, saying he could only raise up someone who had died recently and asked him to bring back to life Sam the Ibn Noah. Heading to his grave, Jesus (as) asked ALLAH to bring this man back to life, and Sam the Ibn Noah came out of the grave.But his hair was gray and in his time there was as yet no aging, so Jesus asked him about that and Sam the Ibn Noah said "I thought that the Day of Resurection had come; from fear of that day my hair turned grey."
The miracle of the Holy Table:
For those who may not know, Islam believes in Jesus. (In arabic, his name is Essa, or Isa (peace be upon him) depending on pronounciation). We believe that Isa will return, that we will fight the Dajaal and overcome thereby, and will rule for a predetermined period of time. We believe that he was chosen by Allah (the One living and eternal and self-subsisting God).
In ancient hebrew, the word "father" is similar to the word ALLAH in that it actually means "creator". This is an extremely important fact, a "father" attributes to a creator some sense of "equality" with mankind, and to say furthermore that the Creator has a son, is, linguistically speaking and spiritually, incorrect.
I will not in this post go in to the merits of "was Jesus God" because every muslim reading this knows there is ONLY One God and God can neither be born nor can HE die. Every one who's read the bible (whatever version that may be) will confirm it also says this, since God has NO beginning and NO end. Enough said on that count, we will leave it to another day.
Today I dedicate this post to one of the most inspirational and well loved Prophets; Jesus (Isa, peace be upon him). From the miracle of his conception to the miracles he made which show that he truly was a chosen one; some miracles are in the versioned bibles and some are not. There are a few that christians do not usually know about.
So here is the story of Jesus (Isa as)..
The hebrew people had settled in the blessed land of Palestine. There were 12 tribes of Israel.They held the Torah as Moses (Musa as) had remembered and written it down after breaking the inital plates that Allah had dicated to him. At this point we refer to Allah and the God of the Torah as one and the same. At this stage, they still followed the TORAH as it was originally given. The Prophet David (Dawud as) and his son the Prophet Solomon (Suleiman as) were commended as great kings and commanded great respect.The people led noble lives and where they did not, Suleiman (as) was a most excellent judge.
As time went on, people began to pay less and less attention to the laws of piety and converted to the pagan ways of the Romans who's influence lay everywhere!. The Levites and the Pharasses and Sadjucees, in charge of the holy Torah and the Holy laws, began to notice that and they in turn, also corrupted, hid certain things from the Holy Book and changed others so as to obtain political and spiritual control of a people who had begun to stray.
The people adopted sinful ways and the Pharasees bought and sold salvation and forgiveness just as many years later the Catholics would do.
The Romans were the superpower of the day. They were pagan, they believed in many man-made gods and adopted more as their territory expanded, embracing even the witchcraft and sorcery learnt from Egypt. They had temples dedicated to various gods, temple prostitutes were well employed and they lived a life of slavery to carnal desires. The ruling class lived lives of spoilt depravity and ritches, arrogance and wastage. The cast system was rife and ordinary people lived in misery and slavery. Women had no rights and enjoyed no priveledge, except for the prostitutes of the Roman temples.
Herod took power of the Roman empire and whilst he epitomised the cruelty of the time, his own people disliked him - any complaint was, quite literally, put to the sword.
The Conception and Birth of Jesus - Prophet Isa (PBUH)
Allah, the Beneficent, wanted to guide the depraved humanity to the right path. Once again he decided to send a prophet, to bring people back to Him and to forgive them their sins should they turn to HIM in repentance.
Maryam (Mary) was a beautiful maiden young girl who loved God and sought to serve him. She was virtuous, and chaste. She prayed continuously and tried to follow the laws of Moses (Musa as) as much as possible. Growing up in the house of the Prophet Zakariyya (peace be upon him) she had learnt a good deal about Allah and His religion.
The Quran tells us that an angel appeared to Maryam (Mary), to announce to her the "gift of a holy son" (19:19). Maryam (Mary) was astonished at the news, and asked: "How shall I have a son, seeing that no man has touched me, and I am not unchaste?" (19:20). When the angel explained to her that she had been chosen for the service of Allah (SWT), and that Allah (SWT) had ordained the matter, she devoutly submitted herself to His will. The Quran further describes that Maryam (Mary, mother of Jesus) retreated from her people (outside the city), and gave birth to Prophet Isa (Jesus, peace upon him) underneath a remote date palm tree. The date palm tree miraculously provided nourishment for Maryam (Mary) during labor and birth. (See Chapter 19 of the Noble Qur'an for the entire story. The chapter has aptly been named "The Chapter of Maryam (Mary, mother of Jesus)")
The Quran repeatedly reminds us that Prophet Adam, the first human being, was born with neither a human mother nor a human father. So the miraculous birth of Jesus (Isa as) affords him no higher standing or presumed partnership with God than Adam. When God ordains a matter, He merely says, "Be" and it is so. "The similitude of Jesus before God is as that of Adam. He created him from dust, then said to him: "Be!" And he was" (3:59).
The angel's visit caused Mary a tremendous amount of anxiety which grew as her baby grew. How could she possibly face giving birth to the child without a husband? She left the temple and went to Nazareth, where she was born and settled in a simple farm house to avoid the public. But still, the anxiety continued. What would people say? Her father was pure man, and her mother, pious, had given birth to her as a gift of Allah! The tongues would surely wag!
Eventually, she decided to leave. She had no idea where she would go but she knew she needed to get away. She sat down in the trunk of a dead palm tree and there she gave birth to a son. She was now even more worried, confused as to what would become of her and how she would care for this baby without food or drink.
A voice nearby said "Grieve not, for your Lord has placed a rivulet below. Shake the truck of this tree and ripe dates will fall. Eat and drink and regain the strength you lost, and be of good cheer, for what you see is by the power of Allah, who made te dry palm tree regain life in order to provide food for you."
Slowly, she regained her strength, comforted by Allah's provision, and in her mind she knew she needed to return to society. The thought of returning was accompanied by the same stress and fears of what people would say. Sensing his mother's worry, the baby began to speak. "If you meet anyone say 'I have vowed to fast for The Beneficent and may not speak to any human today." The miracle of the baby speaking to her gave her courage to do just that. As was to be expected, they chastised her on seeing her, told her she'd committed a terrible sin. She put her finger to her lips and pointed to the child. They asked "how can we speak to a newborn baby?!" But to their total amazement, the child began to speak, clearly, saying "I am Allah's servant. Allah has given me the Book, has made me a prophet, and has blessed me wherever I may be, and has enjoined on me prayers and alms-giving as long as I live. Allah has made me dutiful towards she who has borne me. He has not made me arrogant nor unblessed. Peace unto me the day I was born, the day I die, and the day I shall be raised Alive."
Let's review the happenings thus far as per the Quran itself:
And mention in the Book (the Qur'an, O Muhammad, the story of) Mary, when she withdrew in seclusion from her family to a place facing east. She placed a screen (to screen herself) from them; then We sent to her Our Ruh (angel Gabriel), and he appeared before her in the form of a man in all respects.
She said: "Verily! I seek refuge with the Most Beneficent (Allah) from you, if you do fear Allah."
The angel said: "I am only a Messenger from your Lord, (to announce) to you the gift of a righteous son."
She said: "How can I have a son, when no man has touched me, nor am I unchaste?" He said: "So (it will be), your Lord said: "That is easy for Me (Allah): and (We wish) to appoint him as a sign to mankind and a mercy from Us (Allah), and it is a matter (already) decreed, (by Allah).'"
So she conceived him, and she withdrew with him to a far place (Bethlehem valley, about four to six miles from Jerusalem). And the pains of childbirth drove her to the trunk of a palm tree. She said: "Would that I had died before this, and had been forgotten and out of sight!"
Then (the babe "Jesus" or Gabriel) cried unto her from below her, saying: "Grieve not! Your Lord has provided you a water stream under you; and shake the trunk of palm tree towards you, it will let fall fresh ripe dates upon you. So eat and drink and be glad, and if you see any human being, say: 'Verily! I have vowed a fast unto the Most Beneficent (Allah) so I shall not speak to any human being this day.'"
Then she brought him (the baby) to her people, carrying him. They said: "O Mary! Indeed you have brought a thing Fariyya (an unheard mighty thing). O sister (the like) of Aaron (not the brother of Moses, but he was another pious man at the time of Mary)! Your father was not a man who used to commit adultery, nor was your mother an unchaste woman."
Then she pointed to him. They said: "How can we talk to one who is a child in the cradle?"
He (Jesus) said: "Verily! I am a slave of Allah. He has given me the Scripture and made me a Prophet; and He has made me blessed wheresoever I be, and has enjoined me prayer, and Zakat, as long as I live, and dutiful to my mother, and made me not arrogant, unblest. And Salam (peace) be upon me the day I was born, and the day I die, and the day I shall be raised alive!"
Joseph was really surprised to hear of the birth of Jesus (as). He
Such is Jesus, son of Mary. (It is) a statement of truth, about which they doubt (or dispute). It befits not (the Majesty of) Allah that He should beget a son (this refers to the slander of Christians against Allah, by saying that Jesus is the son of Allah). Glorified (and Exalted be He above all that they associate with Him). When He decrees a thing, He only says to it, "Be!" - and it is.
Jesus said: "And verily Allah is my Lord and your Lord. So worship Him (Alone). That is the Straight Path. (Allah's Religion of Islamic Monotheism which He did ordain for all of His Prophets)."
Then the sects differed (the Christians about Jesus), so woe unto the disbeliveers (those who gave false witness saying that Jesus is the son of Allah) from the meeting of a great Day (the Day of Resurrection, when they will be thrown in the blazing Fire).
How clearly will they (polytheists and disbeliveers in the Oneness of Allah) see and hear, the Day when they will appear before Us! But the Zalimun (polytheists and wrong-doers) today are in plain error. And warn them (O Muhammad) of the Day of grief and regrets, when the case has been decided, while now they are in a state of carelessness and they believe not. (Ch 19:16-39 Quran)
Joseph (a carpenter) was very suprised at the story of the birth of Jesus (as) He asked Mary how it could be that a tree could grow without a seed. Mary replied thatit is possible because a the one who created the first tree didn't need a seed, and so too Adam didn't require a seed to be made since Allah does as HE pleases.
The Pharisees and Sadducees felt that this child was dangerous - news of his miraculous birth would no doubt turn people away from obeying their rules and they would loose authority over people who would turn back to God as their only source, thus causing their jewish tenents to crumble. They tried to suppress news of the chil's speech in infancy and accused Mary of a great misdeed. Joseph married Mary, and islam has no problem with Mary having had children afterwards as it does not detract from her saintliness. She was a virgin mother, it doesn't mean to say she died a virgin. After all, she was married and loved her husband Joseph.
By the time Jesus (Essa as) was twelve, he accompanied his mother to Jerusalem. He wanded into the temple and joined a crowd that was listening to the Rabbis. He gave his opinions and taught in the synagogue which disturbed the Rabbis greatly. They were unable to answer the questions he put to them. Try as they might they couldn't silence him. The story of Mary's panic discovering Jesus was missing can also be found in the bible, but the rest of the story is absent, changed just as the then Pharisees and Sadjucees had changed the Torah. Jesus became so engrossed in the discussion that he forgot it was time to head home. In the meantime Mary had left, thinking he might have returned with his relatives or friends. But when she got home and didn't find him there, she panicked - raced back to town, searched high and low for her son. And there was.. sitting in the temple among the learned, debating and conversing with them as though this was the most natural thing. He had forgotten all about the time.
Jesus the boy, becomes a man..
Just as many other aspects of worship had been traded for a life of luxury or labour depending on which side of the breadline one lived, so too the practice of the Sabath had fallen by the way side, as Jesus grew. The old practices of complete rest and worship had simply fallen away or became twisted - suddenly calling a dr for a gravely ill patient was sinful. Life was riddled by hipocrisy, and framed by the outlines of complacency issued by the religious leaders. They were tought that the Sabath was kept in heaven and hence they needed to "observe" the Sabbath . The pharisees took the emphasis off worship and placed it on "doing nothing". You could not travel more than one thousand yards on a Sabbath, etc. 20 000 priests earned their living from the temple, and the rooms f the temple were full. Jesus noticed there were more priests than worshipers, but yet the temples were overflowing with animals being sold for sacrifices for various penances and forgivenesses.
Every step into the temple and within the temple had to be paid for - the catholics years later did no less, didn't they, which provokes the catholic reformation - ? But that's another topic.
There were so many laws, so many sins, and each one had to be paid for with blood of an animal for sacrifice. Every small thing was sinful - even calling that dr for a sick patient. On his way to the temple, Jesus picked two pieces of fruit to feed a hungry child - a violation of the Pharisees! He made a fire for an old women to keep her warm - another violation. He went into the temple and looked around at the 20 000 registered priests.
The Pharisees and Sadducees, who always disagreed about everything, argued continuously, selling off sacrifices whilst arguing. The poor who could not afford the sacrifice offerings for the payment of "sins" and "religious offences" were chased away. The poor queued on the temple stairs, the ill, waiting for a little charity, a little food. But none was given whilst inside the fires roared with the roasting sacrifices. On this same night John (pbuh) and Zakariah (pbuh) were killed by the ruling powers. On the same night, Jesus was told by Allah to call the childred of Israel and turn them BACK to Allah. Jesus spoke out, denounced, and charged that "marketplace" of thieves declaring Allah's word and calling people to a nobler life.
Jesus the Prophet
Throughout his life, Jesus continued to invite people back to the Creator. He performed many miracles, and in Allah's name - (ALLAH working through him), he carved a bird out of clay, and breathed into it so that ALLAH, through him, brought the bird to life. The Romans were not at this stage concerned about Jesus. So long as the Jews were bothered by Jesus they were distracted away from the occupation of Rome.
At one point, they tried to trick Jesus. They brought a woman forward and said "does not the law stipulate the stoning of an adulteress?" Jesus answered "yes" and they argued that if that woman was an adulteress then she should be destroyed, and if he opposed this then he would be destroying his own teaching of a God of forgiveness.
Jesus looked at the Pharisees. He knew they were guilty of FAR more than this woman, so he said "Whoever of YOU is sinless you can stone her!" This did not abolish the law - it pointed out the hypocrisy, it taught about the importance of following a leader that is pious, it spoke to the lies of the pharisees and their "tests", and he attested to the fact that religious leaders are not executioners - ALL IN ONE!
On his way to the temple that moring, Jesus had been followed by a woman who knelt before him and washed his feet with perfume and tears. Jesus asked her to stand an then said "Oh Lord, Forgive her sins."
Jesus taught people to have mercy on one another, to believe in ONE God, the Creator, through him, Allah raised 3 people from the dead. The Jews mocked him, saying he could only raise up someone who had died recently and asked him to bring back to life Sam the Ibn Noah. Heading to his grave, Jesus (as) asked ALLAH to bring this man back to life, and Sam the Ibn Noah came out of the grave.But his hair was gray and in his time there was as yet no aging, so Jesus asked him about that and Sam the Ibn Noah said "I thought that the Day of Resurection had come; from fear of that day my hair turned grey."
Jesus continued to pray for the Mercy of ALLAH Al Rahmaan (the Merciful) -
The Quran says: "O Jesus, son of Mary! Remember My Favor to you and to your mother when I supported you with Ruh-ul-Qudus (Gabriel) so that you spoke to the people in the cradle and in maturity; and when I taught you writing, Al Hikmah (the power of understanding), the Torah and the Gospel; and when you made out of the clay, as it were, the figure of a bird, by My Permission, and you breathed into it, and it became a bird by My Permission, and you healed those born blind, and the lepers by My Permission, and when you brought forth the dead by My Permission; and when I restrained the Children of Israel from you (when they resolved to kill you) since you came unto them with clear proofs, and the disbeliveers among them said: 'This is nothing but evident magic.'" And when I (Allah) put in their hearts of the disciples (of Jesus) to believe in Me and My Messenger, they said: "We believe. And bear witness that we are Muslims." (Ch 5:110-111 Quran) Almighty Allah also revealed: "And He Allah will teach him (Jesus) the Book and Al Hikmah (the Sunna, the faultless speech of the Prophets, wisdom, etc.), (and) the Torah and the Gospel.
And will make him (Jesus) a Messenger to the Children of Israel (saying): "I have come to you with a sign from your Lord, that I design for you out of clay, as it were, the figure of a bird, and breathe into it, and it becomes a bird by Allah's Leave; and I heal him who was born blind, and the leper, and I bring the dead to life by Allah's leave. And I inform you of what you eat, and what you store in your houses. Surely, therein is a sign for you, if you believe. And I have come confirming that which was before me of the Torah, and to make lawful to you part of what was forbidden to you, and I have come to you with proof from your Lord. So fear Allah and obey me. Truly! Allah is my Lord and your Lord, so worship Him (Alone). This is the Straight Path."
Then when Jesus came to know of their disbelief, he said: "Who will be my helpers in Allah's Cause?" The disciples said: "We are the helpers of Allah; we believe in Allah, and bear witness that we are Muslims (we submit to Allah)."
Our Lord! We believe in what You have sent down, and we follow the Messenger (Jesus); so write us down among those who bear witness (to the truth, La ilaha ill Allah - none has the right to be worshipped but Allah).
And they (disbeliveers) plotted (to kill Jesus), and Allah planned too. And Allah is the Best of the planners. (Ch 3:48-54 Quran)
|
The miracle of the Holy Table:
Allah the Exalted said: Remember when the disciples said: "O Jesus, son of Mary! Can your Lord send down to us a table spread (with food) from heaven?" Jesus said: "Fear Allah, if you are indeed believers." They said: "We wish to eat thereof and to be stronger in Faith and to know that you have indeed told us the truth and that we ourselves be its witnesses."
Jesus, son of Mary, said: "O Allah, our Lord! Send us from heaven a table spread (with food) that there may be for us - for the first and the last of us - a festival and a sign from You; and provide us sustenance, for You are the best of sustainers." Allah said: "I am going to send it down unto you, but if any of you after that disbelieves, then I will punish him with a torment such as I have not inflicted on anyone among all the Alamin (mankind and jinn)." (Ch 5:112-115 Quran)
The Day of the Table became one of the holy days for the disciples and followers of Jesus. Later on, the disciples and followers forgot the real essence of the miracles, and so they worshipped Jesus as a god.
"And remember when Allah will say (on the Day of Resurrection): "O Jesus, son of Mary! Did you say unto men: 'Worship me and my mother as two gods besides Allah?'" He will say: "Glory be to You! It was not for me to say what I had no right to say. Had I said such a thing, You would surely have known it. You know what is in my inner self though I do not know what is in Yours, truly, You, only You, are the All Knower of all that is hidden and unseen. Never did I say to them aught except what You (Allah) did command me to say: 'Worship Allah, my Lord and your Lord', And I was a witness over them while I dwelt amongst them, but when You took me up, You were the Watcher over them, and You are a Witness to all things. (This is a great admonition and warning to the Christians of the whole world). If you punish them, they are Your slaves, and if You forgive them, Verily You, only You are the All Mighty, the All Wise."
Allah will say: "This is a Day on which the truthful will profit from their truth: theirs are Gardens under which rivers flow (in Paradise) - they shall abide therein forever. Allah is pleased with them and they with Him. That is the great success (Paradise). To Allah belongs the dominion of the heavens and the earth and all that is therein, and He is Able to do all things." (Ch 5:116-120 )
And they say: "The Most Beneficent (Allah) has begotten a son (or offspring or children) (as the Jews say: Ezra is the son of Allah, and the Christians say that He has begotten a son (Christ), and the pagan Arabs say that he has begotten daughters (angels, etc.))."
Indeed you have brought forth (said) a terrible evil thing. Whereby the heavens are almost torn, and the earth is split asunder, and the mountains fall in ruins, that they ascribe a son (or offspring or children) to the Most Beneficent (Allah).
But it is not suitable for (the Majesty of ) the Most Beneficent (Allah) that He should beget a son (or offspring or children). There is non in the heavens and the earth but comes unto the Most Beneficent (Allah) as a slave. Verily, He knows each one of them, and has counted them a full counting. And everyone of them will come to Him alone on the Day of Resurrection (without any helper, or protector or defender)." (Ch 19:88-95)
*****
*****
"Yet, they join the jinns as partners in worship with Allah, though He has created them (the jinns), and they attribute falsely without knowledge sons and daughters to Him. Be He Glorified! And Exalted above (all) that they attribute to Him. He is the Originator of the heavens and the earth. How can He have children when He has no wife? He created all things and He is the All-Knower of everything.
Such is Allah, your Lord! La ilaha illa Huwa (none has the right to be worshipped but He), the Creator of all things. So worship Him (Alone), and He is the Wakil (Trustee, Disposer of affairs, Guardian etc.) over all tings.
No vision can grasp Him, but His Grasp is over all vision. He is the Most Subtle and Courteous, Well-Acquainted with all things." (Ch 6:100-103)
*****
"O people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians)! Do not exceed the limits in you religion, nor say of Allah aught but the truth. The Messiah Jesus, son of Mary, was (no more than ) a Messenger of Allah and His Word, ("Be" - and he was) which He bestowed on Mary and a spirit (Ruh) created by Him; so believe in Allah and His Messengers. Say not: "Three (trinity)!" Cease! (It is ) better for you. For Allah is the only One Ilah (God), Glory be to Him (Far Exalted is He) above having a son. To Him belongs all that is in the heavens and all that is in the earth. And Allah is All Sufficient as a Disposer of affairs.
The Messiah will never be proud to reject to be a slave to Allah, nor the angels who are near (to Allah). And whosoever rejects His worship and is proud, then He will gather them all together unto Himself. So, as for those who believed (in the Oneness of Allah - Islamic Monotheism) and did deeds of righteousness, He will give their (due) rewards, and more out of His Bounty. But as for those who refuse His worship and were proud, He will punish them with a painful torment. And they will not find for themselves besides Allah any protector or helper." (Ch 4:171-173 )
*****
"O people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians)! Do not exceed the limits in you religion, nor say of Allah aught but the truth. The Messiah Jesus, son of Mary, was (no more than ) a Messenger of Allah and His Word, ("Be" - and he was) which He bestowed on Mary and a spirit (Ruh) created by Him; so believe in Allah and His Messengers. Say not: "Three (trinity)!" Cease! (It is ) better for you. For Allah is the only One Ilah (God), Glory be to Him (Far Exalted is He) above having a son. To Him belongs all that is in the heavens and all that is in the earth. And Allah is All Sufficient as a Disposer of affairs.
The Messiah will never be proud to reject to be a slave to Allah, nor the angels who are near (to Allah). And whosoever rejects His worship and is proud, then He will gather them all together unto Himself. So, as for those who believed (in the Oneness of Allah - Islamic Monotheism) and did deeds of righteousness, He will give their (due) rewards, and more out of His Bounty. But as for those who refuse His worship and were proud, He will punish them with a painful torment. And they will not find for themselves besides Allah any protector or helper." (Ch 4:171-173 )
*****
"And the Jews say: Ezra is the son of Allah, and the Christians say: Messiah is the son of Allah. That is a saying from their mouths. They imitate the saying of the disbeliveers of old. Allah's Curse be on them, how they are deluded away from the truth!
They (Jews and Christians) took their rabbis and their monks to be their lords besides Allah, (by obeying them in things which they made lawful or unlawful according to their own desires without being ordered by Allah) and (they also took as their lord) Messiah, son of Mary , while they (Jews and Christians) were commanded (in the Torah and the Gospel) to worship none but One Ilah (God- Allah) La ilaha illa Huwa (none has the right to be worshipped but He). Praise and glory be to Him, (far above is He) from having the partners they associate (with Him)". (Ch 9:30-32 )
*****
"Now ask them (O Muhammad): "Are there (only) daughters for your Lord and sons for them?" Or did We create the angels females while they were witnesses?
*****
"Now ask them (O Muhammad): "Are there (only) daughters for your Lord and sons for them?" Or did We create the angels females while they were witnesses?
Verily, it is of their falsehood that they (Quraish pagans) say: "Allah has begotten off-spring or children (angels are the daughters of Allah)" And, verily, they are liars!
Has He (then) chosen daughters rather than sons? What is the matter with you? How do you decide? Will you not then remember? Or is there for you a plain authority? Then bring your Book if you are truthful!
And they have invented a kinship between Him and the jinns, but the jinn know well that they have indeed to appear (before Him) (i.e. they will be brought for accounts).
Glorified be Allah! (He is free) from what they attribute unto Him! Except the slaves of Allah, whom He chooses (for His Mercy i.e. true believers of Islamic Monotheism who do not attribute false things unto Allah)." (Ch 37:149-160)
*****
*****
"Surely, in disbelief are they who say that Allah is the Messiah, son of Mary. Say (O Muhammad): "Who then has the least power against Allah, if He were destroy the Messiah, son of Mary, his mother, and all those who are on the earth together?" And to Allah belongs the dominion of the heavens and the earth, and all that is between them. He creates what He wills. And Allah is Able to do all things.
And (both) the Jews and Christians say; "We are the children of Allah and His loved ones." Say: "Why then does He punish you for your sins?" Nay, you are but human beings, of those He has created, He forgive whom He wills and He punishes whom He wills. And to Allah belongs the dominion of the heavens and the earth and all that is between them, and to Him is the return of all.
O people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians)! Now has come to you Our Messenger (Muhammad) making (things) clear unto you, after a break in (the series of ) Messengers, lest you say: "there came unto us no bringer of glad tidings and no warner." But now has come unto you a bringer of glad tidings and a warner. And Allah is Able to do all things. (Ch 5:17-19)
*****
*****
"Surely they have disbelieved who say: "Allah is the Messiah (Jesus), son of Mary." But the Messiah (Jesus) said: "O Children of Israel! Worship Allah, my Lord and your Lord." Verily, whosoever sets up partners in worship with Allah, then Allah has forbidden Paradise for him, and the Fire will be his abode. And for the Zalimun (polytheists, and wrong-doers) there are no helpers.
Surely, disbeliveers are those who said: "Allah is the third of the three (in a Trinity)." But there is no Ilah (god) (none who has the right to be worshipped) but One Ilah (God- Allah). And if they cease not from what they say, verily, a painful torment will befall the disbeliveers among them.
Will they not repent to Allah and ask His Forgiveness? For Allah is Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful.
The Messiah (Jesus), son of Mary, was no more than a Messenger; many were the Messengers that passed away before him. His mother (Mary) was a Siddiqah (she believed in the Words of Allah, and His Books. They both used to eat food, as any other human being, while Allah does not eat). Look how We made the Ayat (proofs, evidences, verses, lessons, signs, revelations, etc.) clear to them, yet look how they are deluded away from the truth."
(Ch 5:72-75)
*****
(Ch 5:72-75)
*****
"And say: "All the praises and thanks be to Allah, Who has not begotten a son (nor an offspring), and Who has no partner in His Dominion, nor He is low to have a Wali (helper, protector, or supporter). And magnify Him with all the magnificence, (Allahu-Akbar, Allah is the Most Great)." (Ch 17:111)
*****
*****
Thursday, September 13, 2012
Questionable AUTHENTICITY
Bismillahir Rahmaanir Raheem,
Further to my last post, i simply HAD to post this - Somebody needs to phone the Pope and tell him that he's in trouble, according to christians. Remember, this is not ME, a muslim, saying so. I respect the Pope. I think he's living as best he can the principles he's been taught and those in his version of the book. But you see, the Pope has an Apocrypha... and here's what christians have to say about it -
Please bear in mind my previous post - that quote from the bible which says that NOTHING WILL BE CHANGED FROM THE LAW of GOD/teachings of Moses/ Written word until ALL is accomplished (one assumes this includes the book of revelations since most bibles still have that one in it) I've taken the liberty of commenting in PURPLE.. The bold print is also mine. All rights to this auther, Cooper Abrams, whoever he/she is..
The Apocryphal BooksAre they lost books of the Bible?
by Cooper Abrams
The fifteen Apocryphal books which the Roman Catholics have included in their Bibles,(christians will say its all the same) come from a collection of about eighteen or more books written during the Inter-testamental Period. This period of four hundred years began with God giving the last book of the Old Testament which was Malachi. The Inter-testamental period ended with the coming of Christ and the writing of the New Testament. During this four hundred years God sent no prophets to Israel and was silent giving no written revelation. (Wasn't the TORAH revelation enough?)
The word "apocrypha" means "of questionable authenticity." (please see my old post - WHICH BIBLE EXACTLY is authentic, by ANY standards? What measurement has been used to say that these books of the apocypha are not authentic versus the others?)
These are called non canonical books because when the canon of Scriptures (the sixty six books of the Old and New Testaments) was accepted by the early Christians they recognized that these books contained spurious material and therefore were not inspired of God. (erm - I beg to differ - the earliest ORGANISED church after the bible was composed was the ROMAN CATHOLIC and the GREEK ORTHODOX and BOTH recognised these as part of the bible!)
Other names for these books are "hidden" or "deuterocanonical" books. These books are also called "pseudepigraphal", meaning "false writings" (as opposed to true writings measured by whom?) to designate them as spurious and unauthentic books of the late centuries B. C. and early centuries A. D. These books contain religious folklore and have never been considered inspired of God by biblical Christians from the earliest times of churches. ( it was SO CONSIDERED inspired by God that even catholics today have them! - SOMEBODY PHONE THE POPE!)
Some (who's that? didnt you just say they've never been considered?) have referred to these books as the missing books of the Bible and conclude they are new discovers which are part of God's revelation. Nothing could be further from the truth. (who's truth?) The sixty six books that comprise the Old and Testament are God's revelation to man (so erm.. why change 'em?) and when John completed the Book of Revelation, God's word to man was complete. (Clearly not - its still been changing) God has not added to His revelation since. (But MAN, has!) The content of these spurious books shows them to be inspired of man...not God. (so all the versions are inspired by whom, EXACTLY!?)
It is also noteworthy that the Roman Catholic church which is a false church with false doctrines and pagan teachings (OUCH!! the smoke at the Vatican has just dipped - !) accepts these books as scripture. (note to self - the writer will soon say it doesn't.. read on..)
Further, some of the cults including the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints,(who call themselves christians and have a bible just like this writer!) the Mormons, also accept them as scripture.
No biblical Christians or churches have ever accept them as such. (BINGO - She done it! the POPE isn't biblical? Isn't the Catholic church established because of that quote in the bible "ON THIS ROCK I BUILD MY CHURCH" (referring to Peter) and isn't the POPE the replacement for PETER? LMAO!!)
The fact is there are no lost books of the Bible. (erm - YES, there are - the gospel of Barnabas, the gospel of Thomas, the gospel of Jude, the gospel of Niccodemus - weren't these DISCIPLES, according to christianity, of Jesus? Why then, are they not in the bible? OH WAIT _ It's because they say JESUS WAS A PROPHET!)
These books or writings from the Apocrypha that the Roman Catholic Church claims are inspired are Tobit, Judith, Wisdom of Solomon, Ecclesiasticus, Baruch, 1 & 2 Maccabees, Letter of Jeremiah, additions to Esther, Prayer of Azariah, Susanna (Daniel 13), and Bel and the Dragon (Daniel 14). (let's get this straight, brothers and sisters, The WISDOM OF SOLOMON is not biblical Ecclesiastes 1 is christian but not Ecclesiastes 2 OR ecclesiasticus written by the same person, and DANIEL - the guy in the lion's den - can't be in the bible? hmm...)
Three other Apocryphal books in the Septuagint, the Prayer of Manasseh, and 1 & 2 Esdras, are not considered to be inspired or canonical by the Roman Catholic Church. (I forget, didn't he just say the catholic church accepted them?) These books were not accepted by the Roman Catholic church until 1546 in the Council of Trent. Therefore for over 1300 years, since the inception of the Roman Church in the fourth Century, even they did not considered them inspired. (and TODAY's bible has not been "accepted" since the latest edition/revision. And today's BIBLE has not been in existance until along came the king - to argue for a bible who has undergone the same type of change is pure hypocrisy!)
Why do non-Catholic authorities reject the Apocrypha as being a part of the sixty six books of the canon?
Further to my last post, i simply HAD to post this - Somebody needs to phone the Pope and tell him that he's in trouble, according to christians. Remember, this is not ME, a muslim, saying so. I respect the Pope. I think he's living as best he can the principles he's been taught and those in his version of the book. But you see, the Pope has an Apocrypha... and here's what christians have to say about it -
Please bear in mind my previous post - that quote from the bible which says that NOTHING WILL BE CHANGED FROM THE LAW of GOD/teachings of Moses/ Written word until ALL is accomplished (one assumes this includes the book of revelations since most bibles still have that one in it) I've taken the liberty of commenting in PURPLE.. The bold print is also mine. All rights to this auther, Cooper Abrams, whoever he/she is..
The Apocryphal BooksAre they lost books of the Bible?
by Cooper Abrams
The fifteen Apocryphal books which the Roman Catholics have included in their Bibles,(christians will say its all the same) come from a collection of about eighteen or more books written during the Inter-testamental Period. This period of four hundred years began with God giving the last book of the Old Testament which was Malachi. The Inter-testamental period ended with the coming of Christ and the writing of the New Testament. During this four hundred years God sent no prophets to Israel and was silent giving no written revelation. (Wasn't the TORAH revelation enough?)
The word "apocrypha" means "of questionable authenticity." (please see my old post - WHICH BIBLE EXACTLY is authentic, by ANY standards? What measurement has been used to say that these books of the apocypha are not authentic versus the others?)
These are called non canonical books because when the canon of Scriptures (the sixty six books of the Old and New Testaments) was accepted by the early Christians they recognized that these books contained spurious material and therefore were not inspired of God. (erm - I beg to differ - the earliest ORGANISED church after the bible was composed was the ROMAN CATHOLIC and the GREEK ORTHODOX and BOTH recognised these as part of the bible!)
Other names for these books are "hidden" or "deuterocanonical" books. These books are also called "pseudepigraphal", meaning "false writings" (as opposed to true writings measured by whom?) to designate them as spurious and unauthentic books of the late centuries B. C. and early centuries A. D. These books contain religious folklore and have never been considered inspired of God by biblical Christians from the earliest times of churches. ( it was SO CONSIDERED inspired by God that even catholics today have them! - SOMEBODY PHONE THE POPE!)
Some (who's that? didnt you just say they've never been considered?) have referred to these books as the missing books of the Bible and conclude they are new discovers which are part of God's revelation. Nothing could be further from the truth. (who's truth?) The sixty six books that comprise the Old and Testament are God's revelation to man (so erm.. why change 'em?) and when John completed the Book of Revelation, God's word to man was complete. (Clearly not - its still been changing) God has not added to His revelation since. (But MAN, has!) The content of these spurious books shows them to be inspired of man...not God. (so all the versions are inspired by whom, EXACTLY!?)
It is also noteworthy that the Roman Catholic church which is a false church with false doctrines and pagan teachings (OUCH!! the smoke at the Vatican has just dipped - !) accepts these books as scripture. (note to self - the writer will soon say it doesn't.. read on..)
Further, some of the cults including the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints,(who call themselves christians and have a bible just like this writer!) the Mormons, also accept them as scripture.
No biblical Christians or churches have ever accept them as such. (BINGO - She done it! the POPE isn't biblical? Isn't the Catholic church established because of that quote in the bible "ON THIS ROCK I BUILD MY CHURCH" (referring to Peter) and isn't the POPE the replacement for PETER? LMAO!!)
The fact is there are no lost books of the Bible. (erm - YES, there are - the gospel of Barnabas, the gospel of Thomas, the gospel of Jude, the gospel of Niccodemus - weren't these DISCIPLES, according to christianity, of Jesus? Why then, are they not in the bible? OH WAIT _ It's because they say JESUS WAS A PROPHET!)
These books or writings from the Apocrypha that the Roman Catholic Church claims are inspired are Tobit, Judith, Wisdom of Solomon, Ecclesiasticus, Baruch, 1 & 2 Maccabees, Letter of Jeremiah, additions to Esther, Prayer of Azariah, Susanna (Daniel 13), and Bel and the Dragon (Daniel 14). (let's get this straight, brothers and sisters, The WISDOM OF SOLOMON is not biblical Ecclesiastes 1 is christian but not Ecclesiastes 2 OR ecclesiasticus written by the same person, and DANIEL - the guy in the lion's den - can't be in the bible? hmm...)
Three other Apocryphal books in the Septuagint, the Prayer of Manasseh, and 1 & 2 Esdras, are not considered to be inspired or canonical by the Roman Catholic Church. (I forget, didn't he just say the catholic church accepted them?) These books were not accepted by the Roman Catholic church until 1546 in the Council of Trent. Therefore for over 1300 years, since the inception of the Roman Church in the fourth Century, even they did not considered them inspired. (and TODAY's bible has not been "accepted" since the latest edition/revision. And today's BIBLE has not been in existance until along came the king - to argue for a bible who has undergone the same type of change is pure hypocrisy!)
Why do non-Catholic authorities reject the Apocrypha as being a part of the sixty six books of the canon?
- There are mainly four reasons: 1. They abound in historical and geographical inaccuracies and anachronisms. 2. They teach doctrines which are false and foster practices which are at variance with inspired Scripture. 3. They resort to literary types and display an artificiality of subject matter and styling out of keeping with inspired Scripture. 4. They lack the distinctive elements which give genuine Scripture their divine character, such as prophetic power and poetic and religious feeling. Here's the real reason - BECAUSE they know that it doesn't say what they want it to say - they know there are gaps in their own scripture. They cannot judge the prophetic power and religious feeling which are subjective to the WRITER and the READER... the catholics will say only a catholic can understand the apocrapha "in the spirit".. Shukr there's no such problems with the QURAN - it IS what it IS - God said it, Muhammad (saw) by-hearted it - and EVERY SINGLE THING ABOUT HIS LIFE is "authenticated", very painstakingly.
- 1. These books existed before New Testament times, (NEW TESTAMENT didn't exist before NICENE council times, but the gospel of BARNABAS did! So did the gospel of Thomas, etc etc etc) yet there is not one single quotation from the Apocrypha is in the New Testament. (actually, there is.. quite a few..but it depends on your definition of "quotation". since the new testament was written AFTER * see the first paragraph - IT should be quoting Jesus not the other way, right?)
- Jesus quoted from twenty four of the Old Testament books, (lol - he had "left the building" by then!) and the New Testament quotes from thirty four books of the Old Testament. Introductory phrases like "it is written" or "thus says the Lord" are totally absent from the books and therefore the books themselves do not claim to be inspired of God. (BUT these quotes ARE existant in the gospel of JESUS, the gospel of THOMAS, the gospel of BARNABAS) The books of 1st and 2nd Maccabees have historical significance, but when they are compared to the Bible they shown to not be the inspired Word of God. (in other words, they don't fit the mould made by... you guessed it... that king yonks back.. or is the writer comparing it to the LUTHERAN bible? hmm...) Even though they have some historical value these books are clouded by the contradictions found in their text. (Oh yeah,... like the bible doesnt contradict itself over 100 times? READ IT!!) For example, in 1st and 2nd Maccabees, Antiochus Epiphanes is made to die three different deaths in as many different places. 2. Although some of the early church fathers quoted from these writings, and even accepted them as inspired, this does not mean they were inspired. (Wait- didn't you say it was never accepted by any christian?...)The majority of the early church writers rejected these books as being inspired.(oh, so now its just the majority - great you cleared that up for us) Clearly in the Second Century and afterward there were many false teachers and heretics. It is important to know that Jesus nor any of the Apostles quoted from or mention any of these books. (Clearly... and it is important to know that JESUS wrote his own GOSPEL too.. and it ain't tying in with any of this hogwash you're on about!) 3. Some early Greek manuscripts contain the Apocrypha, (HANG ON NOW!! DIdn't you just say the majority didn't accept it? Jeez this is like reading version 16 of the bible!) along with the Septuagint.(the Greek translation of the Hebrew Old Testament). The Septuagint was translated in Alexandra, Egypt which was a hot bed of heresy. (unlike the king, of courseFrom Alexandra also came the corrupted manuscripts of Alpeh, A, B upon which all modern English translations are based (the Westcott-Hort text). (so, in other words, ALL translations are corrupted - didn't I say that already? Isn't it in the Quran?) They including of several of these books in the LXX, (Septuagint) was the natural result of the spirit of heresy and false teaching in Egypt. However, none of these books were ever included in the Hebrew Bible and were never accepted by the Jews. Further no Greek manuscript contains the apocryphal books Go back a paragraph to point 1 "some early greek manuscripts contain the apocrapha" - eish! I can't go on - readers may continue reading and make their own decision.. as does the Roman Catholic Bible. Moreover, not a single ancient manuscript contains all of the apocryphal books. Lastly, only four of the apocryphal books are found in copies of the LXX and these manuscripts date to the fourth century A.D. No copy of the Septuagint before that time has any Apocryphal books included which reflect the progression of heresy in Egypt. 4. The Jews are the ones who canonized the Books of the Old Testament and they did not include them. (Are you saying the THORA has been altered?) They have always excluded these Apocryphal books because the material in these books is heretical and contains gross doctrinal errors. Some of these gross doctrinal errors are; prayers for the dead. Ameen ( 2 Macc. 12:45-46) and salvation by works. (Tobit 12:9). Praying for the dead is not biblical as Hebrews 9:27 plainly states, "And as it is appointed unto men once to die, but after this the judgment." It is, if you're catholic! Wether you read the catholic bible with the apocrapha or not, the doctrinal teachings are that prayer can save a man. There is no second chance after death. Ephesians 2:8-9 clearly states that salvation is not by works or merited by man. "For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God: Not of works, lest any man should boast." Yes, but the bible also says that "FAITH WITHOUT ACTIONS IS DEAD." erm... The stories in the Apocryphal books are extra biblical, fanciful and clearly pure fiction. (Like a lot of the bible, yep yep!) For example the story of Bel and the Dragon is clearly a fairy tale. The tale says that a pagan priest of Bel tried to deceive Daniel by using a trap door to consume food left for the idol Bel. This pagan priest was seeking to convince Daniel that Bel was a real god who ate and drank everyday. How is this fanciful - were you there - or did you forget the story of Adam and Eve and the temptation of the snake? hmm... Another fanciful tale relates that Daniel was miraculously fed by the prophet Habakkuk, who was caught up by an angel in Judea, and taken to help Daniel in the lion's den in Babylon. Daniel lived hundreds of years before this spurious book titled "Bel and the Dragon" was written. Well obviously one writes about history, not about the future! Another such tale is found in Tobit. Tobit, a blind father who supposedly lived in Nineveh, sends his son Tobias on a journey to collect a debt. On a journey Tobias is led by an angel in disguise named Raphael. The angel leads him to the house of a virgin who had been married seven times, but whose husbands were all slain by a demon on their wedding night. Tobias marries the girl and drives away the demon by burning the heart of a certain fish in the bedroom, with the help of Raphael. He returns home with the money and his bride, and then heals his father's eyes with the fish's gall. You need to read about Jinnatti... really, dude! Some of the teachings in these books are colored and some are immoral. In Judith 9:10,13, it says that God, assisted Judith in the telling of lies. The Apocryphal books of Ecclesiasticus and Wisdom teach that morality is based on expedience. In other words, according to these books it is right to sin in some situations. I'm speachless - these are in the Catholic bible, remember, the original "modern christian faith" - the Pope definately needs a phonecall. but maybe I'm not "understanding it in the spirit" as the Catholic says - Alhamdolilah. La illa il Allah. The Book of Wisdom 11:17 teaches that God made the universe out of pre-existing matter instead of "ex nihilo" (out of nothing) as Genesis 1:1-2, John 1:1-3 and Hebrews 11:3 plainly state. (erm - is HE not pre-existing... did HE not create the DUST, from which we are all made? When scientists go to God claiming they don't need him and can make man, he will tell them "get your own dust"... There are also historical errors Tobit claimed that he was alive when the Assyrians conquered Israel in 722 B. C. and when Jeroboam revolted against Judah in 931 B. C. However it records his total life span as 158 years. These two events were actually 859 years apart.And Noah lived over 980 years according to the bible - what's your point? Judith also mistakenly states that Nebuchadnezzar reigned in Nineveh instead of Babylon. (and we all know there was only ever ONE) There are many other gross historical errors as well.
- No true Bible believing church as has ever accepted the books as canonical for these reasons. In order for a book to be considered inspired of God and included in the canon it must satisfy the follow requirements.
- 1. It must have been written by a prophet of God. None of the Apocryphal books claim they were. Dear writer, are you saying that Paul was a prophet of God? or Ruth? or MAthew, Mark, Luke or John were?
2. It must come with the authority of God. Isn't the authority given to some disciples given to ALL - like Barnabas and his gospel, or Thomas, or Judas?
- These spurious books are strikingly absence of the ring of authority. None of them come up to or compare in any way to the character and quality of the sixty six Books of the Bible. 3. It must demonstrate that the power of God rests on the book. There is nothing transforming about these books. 4. It must tell the truth about God, man, history, science, etc. The books are full of contradictions, errors and even heresies. The Apocryphal books are full of untruth. 5. It must be accepted by biblical Christians as inspired of God. The Apocryphal books completely fail this final and fatal test. lmao.... I say no more...
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)




